Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] Mailing List Voting and Formatting Policies

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] Mailing List Voting and Formatting Policies


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Gitgud Software <gitgud AT tfwno.gf>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] Mailing List Voting and Formatting Policies
  • Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2017 11:11:12 -0400

1. NO
2. NO
3. NO
4. NO
5. NO
6. NO

On Thu, 2017-11-02 at 19:53 -0500, Jonah Aragon wrote:
> Hello! 
>
> This vote is on the changes proposed at https://lists.opennicproject.
> org/sympa/arc/discuss/2017-10/msg00135.html. The vote on adding these
> changes to the official OpenNIC policies will end on November 14,
> 2017 at 6:00 PM UTC. 
>
> IMPORTANT, READ BEFORE VOTING: This vote is split up into 6 sections,
> which may be passed individually (they do not depend on each other).
> You should vote YES or NO on every section individually in an ordered
> list 1 through 6. This is an effort to get the portions the community
> most wants passed while keeping open the possibility of dropping
> certain topics that may require more discussion. If your reply
> contains only a single YES or NO, your vote will be counted as either
> YES or NO for all 6 sections proposed, respectively. Each of the six
> sections are labeled as such in the original proposal. 
>
> Here’s a brief summary of the proposal, for your convenience. You
> should read the full proposal linked above prior to voting. 
>
> - Very clear voting outcome requirements. Certain votes may now
> require more than the simple majority of votes that were required for
> any proposals in the past. 
> - Clarified TLD proposal requirements. This should ensure an
> operator’s setup is configured prior to a proposal, and outline what
> exactly is necessary for any operator. 
> - Voting and formal discussion threads posted to this list now have a
> very clear format that MUST be followed. This will prevent confusion
> on what the original poster is expecting from the community. 
> - Formal discussions now have a strict minimum time requirement to be
> active before a vote can be pushed to the list. Voting threads now
> have very clear deadlines. 
> - DNS operators now have certain minimum requirements to meet to keep
> the ability to operate key infrastructure components. 
> - FUTURE peered networks now have requirements to meet before we
> enter an agreement with them. 
>
> Jonah
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproj
> ect.org



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page