discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: Caleb Langeslag <takyoji AT gmail.com>
- To: OpenNIC <discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org>
- Subject: [opennic-discuss] Galium rewrite
- Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 02:15:02 -0600
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=ros46Czz4QPAW8USs7XnWo2bLK5AG80SEoJecdnhYxav2Hmumn4ZLkA03wE48q6rdp iSzjKB6FHRDjbttOya3kBz9PJX1EcZ1ugYwOnhu3qYOa2rw2hZn97P/N60ZpGgCvamZR GBdB/g+7ajR4PaGGx3LN4/O+21S7HYehVkjHo=
- List-archive: <http://lists.darkdna.net/pipermail/discuss>
- List-id: <discuss.lists.opennicproject.org>
Been curiously looking through the Galium source code tonight and
noticed some bugs and vulnerabilities within Galium (which NovaKing
also found a couple hours earlier before I had). Regardless; there's
SQL injection vulnerabilities throughout Galium, and lack of
consistent development styles and structure. Therefore; it would
probably be most sane to just do a complete rewrite of it (which
wouldn't take all that long to do either) that would be more versatile
and offer more functionality.
Thus I'm curious: What you like to see in a rewrite of Galium (if
we'll still call it such; I'm not the original developer or anything)?
- [opennic-discuss] Galium rewrite, Caleb Langeslag, 12/12/2010
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Galium rewrite, Brian Koontz, 12/12/2010
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Galium rewrite, Julian DeMarchi, 12/12/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.