discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: Jeff Taylor <shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net>
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] minor feedback
- Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 17:02:06 -0700
- List-archive: <http://lists.darkdna.net/pipermail/discuss>
- List-id: <discuss.lists.opennicproject.org>
Last night I removed NS4 from the root zone in the root hints file.
For anyone slaving the root zone, you would have gotten an automatic
update with this change. There were a number of T2 servers that would
throw out periodic errors because of NS4 pointing to the wrong location. Although there are no published IPv6 addresses for the T1 servers, I can tell you that ns2.opennic.glue (my server) will respond on 2001:470:8388:10::2 and you are welcome to use this. One of my local ISPs is working on native IPv6 addressing, so I'm hopeful to obtain one sometime in the near future. On 01/04/2011 04:28 PM, Rene Paulokat wrote: hey ya all, have to mention that, at least regarding the specific setup of our provided t2 (pdns_recursor + hints-file), it was the best decision to rip ns4 out of the group of T1's. since then our resolver does not show up with strange behavior regarding the resolving of opennic-tlds anymore. thx! also i'd propose to setup a T1 that has an AAAA entry. otherweise - if i am right - v6-only resolvers like the widespread (djb) dnscache wont be able to resolve opennic-tlds by using the published T1's as authoritative source. if desired, we could provide such ressource... regards rene_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org http://lists.darkdna.net/mailman/listinfo/discuss |
- [opennic-discuss] minor feedback, Rene Paulokat, 01/04/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] minor feedback, Jeff Taylor, 01/04/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] minor feedback, Jeff Taylor, 01/05/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] minor feedback, Jeff Taylor, 01/04/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.