Discuss mailing list

[Maximi89 <maximi89 AT gmail.com>]

2012/3/16 Niels Dettenbach <nd AT syndicat.com>

Am Donnerstag, 15. März 2012, 17:09:33 schrieb Maximi89:

> were not so cooperative...
Is there someone who could explain this in more detail?

this was the response of some guys when I talked about this time ago...

http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/5406

> they have a collision with us:
> .free

Ok,

this is a non going so far. But beforse discussing with how many and who of
the other alternative NICs could be peered with on OpenNIC - how we / you alle
would handle this major problem of possible collisions in general in the
future?

Does it i.e. makes sense to organise something about a real open ICANN
alternative where alternative roots are organiszed in by a set of common /
basic policies - mainly i.e. to avoid collisions. If so, how could be done
this? Users can only use ONE root system or "root policy set" at the end of
the day and many of the roots will grow in TLD space as there will come new
alternative roots too.

Not shure if this are the right questions or the right way to think into now -
but this are just my two cents here... ;)


best regards,


Niels.


--
 ---
 Niels Dettenbach
 Syndicat IT & Internet
 http://www.syndicat.com
 ---

-- 
Maximiliano Augusto Castañón Araneda
Santiago, Chile
Linux user # 394821

Skype: maximi89
MSN: maximi89 AT gmail.com
XMPP/Jabber: maximi89 AT gmail.com