Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] CZ server up again

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] CZ server up again


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Jeff Taylor <shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] CZ server up again
  • Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 17:36:39 -0600

I actually go higher than that... I'm currently running 20/min with 30
burst. The thing you have to look at is what 'normal' traffic looks
like. What happens when you hit a popular website with a ton of
embedded banner ads, traffic monitoring, etc? Every one of those items
has to perform a lookup, so it might not be unusual for a regular user
to perform 20-30 lookups on a single web page, especially if their
system does not locally cache DNS data.

On the other hand, typical service attacks may see hundreds of queries
*per second* and that's the kind of thing you want to stop dead.

Please also see http://wiki.opennicproject.org/Tier2Security for
iptables rules that will refuse to answer certain types of queries known
to be part of attacks. These will stop the attacks dead, not even
allowing a short burst of answers to get through.


On 07/08/2013 11:51 PM, Paladin wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I experienced problem updating system resulting in kinda
> long outage. Server is up and running again.
>
> I'm sorry for any problems.
>
> OT: how big limits do you thing are resonable? I have bind9 with
>
> rate-limit {
> responses-per-second 15;
> window 5;
> }
>
> Do you think this is high enough? Or should I go even lower?
>
> Thank
>
> P.




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page