Discuss mailing list

[Hospedaje Web y Servidores Dedicados <ventas AT dedicados.com.mx>]

sounds interesting, what do you need?


Ing. Alejandro M.
Hospedaje Web y Servidores Dedicados
http://www.dedicados.com.mx
------
correo / msn: ventas AT dedicados.com.mx
skype: dedicados
------
El 04/12/2013 09:41 p.m., Coyo escribió:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names-00
>
> Since this will almost certainly not pass, I was wondering what you 
> guys thought of me running DNS servers that resolved P2P-related 
> domain names?
>
> For Tor's .onion pTLD, it could operate much like onion.to does, as an 
> in-proxy, as I2P would call it, clearnet gateway in tor parlance, 
> while .i2p would function similarly, as an inproxy. If anyone wanted 
> to donate in-proxy services, the .onion and .i2p TLDs could point to a 
> selection of IPv4 and IPv6 reverse proxies (nginx, haproxy, or 
> varnish) which would forward the connection to the appropriate eepsite 
> or hidden service.
>
> It would be a public service much like pool.ntp.org.
>
> The .exit pTLD would be handled similarly, providing a sort of web 
> proxy in effect.
>
> Similar behavior with .gnu and .zkey, with gnunet as the overlay in 
> question. See https://gnunet.org/faq-page#t34n1852 for details. The 
> .zkey pTLD would return the PKEY record as expected. Due to the 
> inherent complexity of managing stateful tables mapping tcp 
> connections and udp sessions to remote services transparently, the 
> ports that are port-network address translated are limited to common 
> services such as XMPP, IRC, SMTP and HTTP. Initially, only HTTP 
> connections may be accepted to reduce NAT-related complexity.
>
> What do you guys think? If anyone would do this, it would probably be 
> me. It would give me an excuse to play with powerdns.
>
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org