discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: Amunak <amunak AT amunak.net>
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] opennic closed ? taken over?
- Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2017 15:05:15 +0100
Oh and I'd like to add that they even state that they want to provide SSL services for .o users in their charter which you voted yes for, so I don't see the issue here? Amunak Dne 07.01.2017 v 15:02 Amunak
napsal(a):
What's your problem? Anyone, including any TLD operator can
create a root CA and issue certificates for their (or virtually
any) domain. And promote it to make users use it if they want.
There are no rules in place preventing this and unless (and
until) we make our own root CA there should not be any, though I
would personally like to see TLD operator - CA working group
member distinction (to limit abuse, as described before). Dne 07.01.2017 v 13:16 spaesani AT mail.com
napsal(a):
|
- [opennic-discuss] opennic closed ? taken over?, spaesani, 01/07/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] opennic closed ? taken over?, Amunak, 01/07/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] opennic closed ? taken over?, Amunak, 01/07/2017
- Re[2]: [opennic-discuss] opennic closed ? taken over?, spaesani, 01/07/2017
- Re[2]: [opennic-discuss] opennic closed ? taken over?, spaesani, 01/07/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] opennic closed ? taken over?, Jonah Aragon, 01/07/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] opennic closed ? taken over?, Amunak, 01/07/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] opennic closed ? taken over?, Amunak, 01/07/2017
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.