discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] Status of .o

From: Jeff Taylor <shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net>
To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Status of .o
Date: Wed, 03 May 2017 09:57:12 -0600
Authentication-results: mx4.sourpuss.net; dmarc=none header.from=sourpuss.net
Dmarc-filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.0 mx4.sourpuss.net B9B6E2D360

Jon, see my reply in the other thread regarding .dyn... but yeah, that was the first one that sat idle with the promise of service, and made a lot of us evaluate the impact of having a TLD sit idle.

On 05/03/2017 09:31 AM, Jon Hebb wrote:

Except for .dyn of course... I don't know why everyone acts like this hasn't happened before.

All of our other TLDs have had
registration up faster

For what it's worth, I would take over .o if it meant I didn't have to see everyone griping about it.


--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org

[opennic-discuss] Status of .o, Theo B, 05/03/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Status of .o, Jon Hebb, 05/03/2017
  - Re: [opennic-discuss] Status of .o, Jeff Taylor, 05/03/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Status of .o, Fusl Dash, 05/03/2017
  - Re: [opennic-discuss] Status of .o, vv, 05/03/2017