Discuss mailing list

["Daniel Quintiliani" <danq AT runbox.com>]

Hi Fusl,

Before drafting an official proposal, you might want to wait until the 
following two votes finish:

[VOTE] Require English in proposals and votes
Proposed by: Daniel Quintiliani
Voting starts: 8/15/2018 0040 UTC
Voting ends 8/22/2018 0040 UTC
As of now* it's tied 2-2, with 1 "invalid" vote (see 2018-08/msg00131.html, 
2018-08/msg00198.html, and 2018-08/msg00204.html) and 1 "(awaiting a reply 
from the individual to see what he wants to call his vote, which is not yea, 
not nay, and is most likely not to be called "write-in", see 
2018-08/msg00149.html, 2018-08/msg00150.html, 2018-08/msg00152.html, 
2018-08/msg00153.html, 2018-08/msg00141.html, and 2018-08/msg00199.html 
awaiting reply)" vote. 
https://lists.opennicproject.org/sympa/arc/discuss/2018-08/msg00113.html

[VOTE] Clarification of voting rules
Proposed by: Al Beano
Voting starts: 2018-08-16 16:00 UTC
Voting ends: 2018-08-23 16:00 UTC
As of now* it's 3-2 no.
https://lists.opennicproject.org/sympa/arc/discuss/2018-08/msg00183.html

If either of them pass, you will likely want to write your proposal to 
include repeal or revision of their language. It's obvious lately that 
OpenNIC users find fault with every little mistake or thing they don't like 
and use it against you, often requiring you to dig stuff up to defend 
yourself (see 2018-08/msg00151.html (in German) and 2018-08/msg00172.html). 
So you need to be prepared to cover all your tracks.

Also keep in mind this proposal to require proposals be in Chinese has no 
start or end date, and appears to be a parody of mine (cf. 
2018-08/msg00113.html):
https://lists.opennicproject.org/sympa/arc/discuss/2018-08/msg00122.html
It was introduced immediately without a discussion thread (see 
2018-08/msg00125.html), and the period is "Begins: Now, Ends: Next Week"

With the attitudes lately, you can never be sure people won't complain about 
OpenNIC, make fun of people, and insist that no rules are broken and demand 
action be taken on it. Just keep all this in mind, given the stuff that's 
happened in recent threads, noting also my citations in this post.

*I hereby state that these vote counts are accurate as of August 18, 2018, 
2106 UTC. I accept that these votes are ongoing, and that these are 
preliminary results. I offer these counts for entertainment and informative 
purposes only to the benefit of OpenNIC members, with no attempt to predict 
or influence the end result of the votes, or for purposes of commentary on 
the OpenNIC democratic system. I offer this preliminary, incomplete count 
with no intent of any unethical, unlawful, or illegal behavior towards any 
OpenNIC member.

--

-Dan Q


On Sat, 18 Aug 2018 17:27:25 +0200, Katie Holly <katie AT opennic.org> wrote:

> I just pushed an update to the repository:
> 
> https://github.com/opennic/dokuwiki-opennic-vote-plugin/commit/83637978dce9b90f94723169cc759bffe9fbc625
> 
> Important features/fixes are:
> 
> + Added link to /user/<voter>
> + Added link to raw voting results data on GitHub: This allows recounting 
> of votes using the raw JSON data that's stored in the Git repositories
> + Added "Invalid" option for spoilt/protest votes: We'll have to figure out 
> how we want to handle spoilt/protest votes. Right now, the code 
> implementation counts spoilt/protest votes the same way as a normal vote 
> option.
> + Added warning that user votes are public visible: "All votes are public 
> visible. Other users are therefore able to tell what you voted on!"
> * Fixed flock deadlock when database file doesn't exist
> 
> Are there any more comments on this or any objections about the general 
> idea? If not, I think we should move on with starting a voting about this.
> 
> On 07/17/2018 10:12 AM, Fusl wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I've recently been working on a DokuWiki plugin to allow OpenNIC members 
> > to start votings in a centralized place that is more cleanly, straight 
> > forward and easier to use: 
> > https://github.com/opennic/dokuwiki-opennic-vote-plugin
> > 
> > The plugin was enabled on our wiki.opennic.org instance since a few 
> > months but was not mature and stable enough. It can be seen in action 
> > here: https://wiki.opennic.org/votings (scroll down to the end of the 
> > page). With the latest commit 
> > (https://github.com/opennic/dokuwiki-opennic-vote-plugin/commit/4d5dd3075168fa383508b29f8486f881746c7bc8)
> >  the plugin became more stable and ensures that all votes are recorded 
> > now.
> > 
> > To create a new voting, one has to browse to 
> > "https://wiki.opennic.org/votings/new_voting_name_here?do=edit"; and fill 
> > the textarea with
> > 
> > 
> > ====== Piwik ======
> > <columns 100% 30% 70%>
> > <devote title="Test Voting" close="2018-10-18">
> >   * Option 1
> >   * Option B
> >   * Other Option
> >   * etc.
> > </devote>
> > <newcolumn>
> > <code>
> > Long, detailed text of what is being voted on.
> > </code>
> > </columns>
> > 
> > 
> > This creates a new wiki page that is automagically included into the 
> > /votings page where all previous and currently open votings are displayed 
> > in chronological order (newest to oldest). Once a voting expires 
> > (`close="2018-10-18"` field), it is automatically closed, no new votes 
> > are possible and the results are displayed.
> > 
> > Note that our DokuWiki instance automatically syncs changes to GitHub 
> > (https://github.com/opennic/wikipages/commit/b66d3f5758fc4181a15786c9346ed72775f4f3c3)
> >  and GitLab 
> > (https://gitlab.com/opennic/wikipages/commit/b66d3f5758fc4181a15786c9346ed72775f4f3c3)
> >  so anyone interested can go there to verify the end results of votings 
> > by comparing these to the results displayed on the wiki.
> > 
> > 
> > What do you all think about using the DokuWiki system for voting going 
> > forward from now on?
> > 
> > Let me know if you have any questions.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Fusl
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --------
> > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> > You may unsubscribe by emailing 
> > discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
> > 
> 
> 
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org