discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: Philipp Schafft <lion AT lion.leolix.org>
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Example domains and localhost entrys
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:24:34 +0200
- List-archive: <http://lists.darkdna.net/pipermail/discuss>
- List-id: <discuss.lists.opennicproject.org>
- Organization: PH2
reflum,
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 16:33 -0500, Larry Brower wrote:
> On 04/26/2011 04:07 PM, Philipp Schafft wrote:
>
> >
> > I consider it to be kind and handy to have them reserved.
> > What do you think?
> >
>
> example.TLD is often used for documentation purposes and as such I think
> should be reserved.
>
>
> >
> > So I recommend to add the localhost entry.
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
>
> I have to disagree here. Systems which misbehave in the manner you
> describe are broken and should be fixed. We should not have to add
> unneeded records to account for broken architecture.
Yes. I'm with you about this. But I simply gave up. Stuff like that
happens to me on systems you beleave to do this right: netcat on Debian
was one of those cases I had. It is just more easy for me to add the
localhost entry than debugging users' systems.
--
Philipp.
(Rah of PH2)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- [opennic-discuss] Example domains and localhost entrys, Philipp Schafft, 04/26/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Example domains and localhost entrys, Larry Brower, 04/26/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Example domains and localhost entrys, Philipp Schafft, 04/28/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Example domains and localhost entrys, Larry Brower, 04/26/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.