discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] Tier-2 status monitor

From: Hospedaje Web y Servidores Dedicados <ventas AT dedicados.com.mx>
To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Tier-2 status monitor
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 11:12:17 -0500
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=dedicados.com.mx; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Source:X-Source-Args:X-Source-Dir; b=y/dfAc7clOy6nF/Fq6BDjAccT/0qd76KHTwN/vuusDVh8+bNcY/G5Xb9GDj8KFZ8Ikwj323wkr322c00QewFX22hOZO7Q3gxG/c7LEqFtFM04Q/PSnzl5lqdwrhjdwFM;
List-archive: <http://lists.darkdna.net/pipermail/discuss>
List-id: <discuss.lists.opennicproject.org>

you are the man!

;)

Ing. Alejandro M.
Hospedaje Web y Servidores Dedicados
http://www.dedicados.com.mx
------
correo / msn: ventas AT dedicados.com.mx
skype: dedicados
------

El 12/08/2011 11:18 p.m., Jeff Taylor escribió:

Hmm that actually pointed out a couple things I missed. OK so *maybe* page validation isn't such a bad thing :-)

I did a bit more poking and figured out why the page wouldn't render when I selected 4.01 transitional... The css class for the status bars was being passed as an upper-case value, even though the actual css was defined in lower-case. Of course none of the validators would recognize that, but it was starting to bug me about why the page didn't render, so I had to dig into it.

So... the page completely validates now. Anything else? :-)

On 08/12/2011 08:12 PM, green wrote:

Jeff Taylor wrote at 2011-08-11 00:02 -0600:

It has been tested in Firefox, but if there are problems, I will attempt to
fix it for other browsers. No I will not fix the page to work with IE6.
Jeff Taylor wrote at 2011-08-12 14:53 -0600:

Someone actually looks for that stuff?

You mentioned Firefox, IE6, and "other browsers". Conforming to standards is
an excellent way to be sure that rendering problems are the browser's and not
the page code's. (Place blame where it is due.)

From the "Any Browser" campaign:
http://www.anybrowser.org/campaign/abdesign3.html#validation

Well ok I fixed most of it,

Excellent!

I also had a lot of trouble with the doctype, as any of
the standard 4.01 entries completely remove all of my CSS coding.

Well, you mention CSS trouble:
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.opennicproject.org%2Ft2log%2F&profile=css21&usermedium=all&warning=1&vextwarning=&lang=en

Maybe that will uncover something and allow you to successfully use
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd";>
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
http://lists.darkdna.net/mailman/listinfo/discuss

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
http://lists.darkdna.net/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Re: [opennic-discuss] Tier-2 status monitor, (continued)
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Tier-2 status monitor, Brian Koontz, 08/13/2011