discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: Christopher <weblionx AT gmail.com>
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] .secure a good thing or not?
- Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 18:44:37 -0700
I don't really see an issue with it. It's not restricting the entire
web to be like that. I also don't see how it would help "the 1% to
hide their shenanigans". If they want to do that they can do that
already. Not that hard to set up secret VPNs.
- weblionx
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Peter Green <peter AT greenpete.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not for a minute suggesting OpenNIC do anything like this, I just
> wonder if this is an agreeable part of the nets being free for anyone to do
> what they want and/or a place for the 1% to hide their shenanigans etc?
>
> Peter
>
> http://arstechnica.com/security/2012/05/my-own-private-internet-secure-tld-floated-as-bad-guy-free-zone/
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You may unsubscribe by
> emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
- [opennic-discuss] .secure a good thing or not?, Peter Green, 05/10/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .secure a good thing or not?, Christopher, 05/10/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .secure a good thing or not?, Alex, 05/10/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .secure a good thing or not?, opennic, 05/11/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .secure a good thing or not?, Alex, 05/10/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .secure a good thing or not?, Christopher, 05/10/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.