Discuss mailing list

[Bersl <bersl2 AT bersl2.info>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

As part of the effort to get .eq up and running, and since it was
plainly obvious that no one liked any of the existing ones very much,
I've been working on writing some domain registry software in Django.
It occurred to me instantly that using the existing DNS UPDATE
mechanism was infinitely preferable to trying to bother with zone
files myself. Plus, this library really caught my eye:

http://www.dnspython.org/

Barring any new distractions or stumbling blocks, I should have a
very, very simple prototype working by Saturday. I'll post a
repository URL then if anyone's interested. Feedback of any kind would
of course be welcome.

On 05/16/2012 03:05 AM, Amrit Panesar wrote:
> The bind nsupdate tool maybe of use for a standardized domain
> registration facility. I was looking to see how I might go about
> using it with my own domain registration setup, it looks
> promising.
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On May 15, 2012, at 6:46 PM, Jeff Taylor <shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net>
> wrote:
> 
>> We've been spotlighted before... various posts on slashdot, digg,
>> and reddit have pushed a lot of traffic towards us.  We have no
>> problems with the influx of traffic, and we have the
>> infrastructure to handle a fairly substantial load of dns
>> queries.  The main website and wiki have a nice assortment of
>> information that is mostly current.  From my viewpoint, the only
>> place we are seriously lacking is in our methods of domain
>> registration - the lack of a common form feels inconsistent to
>> me.
>> 
>> 
>> On 05/15/2012 11:01 AM, Peter Green wrote:
>>> I was wondering about the rest of the system, website, wiki
>>> etc. Is that ready for the world to pull apart?
>>> 
>>> We're certainly going to get some attention now!
>>> 
>>> Peter
>>> 
>>> On Tue, 15 May 2012 11:57:12 -0500, Alex Hanselka wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I would say probably. I'd also appreciate it, now that we
>>>> might get an influx of users wanting .pirate, that it works
>>>> flawlessly. That means all the T1 operators had best add it
>>>> to their zones!
>>>> 
>>>> --- Alex Hanselka alex AT opennicproject.org [2]
>>>> 
>>>> On May 15, 2012, at 11:15 AM, Peter Green wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> I think that constitutes major publicity, doesn't it?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Peter
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Torrentfreak/~3/DaDa7yc9djo/
>>>>> [1]
>>>>> 
>>>>> -------- You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You
>>>>> may unsubscribe by emailing 
>>>>> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Links: ------ [1]
>>> http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Torrentfreak/~3/DaDa7yc9djo/ [2]
>>> mailto:alex AT opennicproject.org
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -------- You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You may
>>> unsubscribe by emailing
>>> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>> 
>> 
>> -------- You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You may
>> unsubscribe by emailing
>> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
> 
> 
> -------- You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You may
> unsubscribe by emailing
> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPs2QvAAoJEGZIAx6yDQgGZY4IAKdb/K38S1W9tlU82N9tkTvG
PtMCtrowsuVRiXujTewCGoavUZZ+6fLzvLKBzGg+iVNkj9TSuQwSKfhp5/a2q+Ec
tNBgczA7fkOluCo3MIb9k7exI283C1CrtI4O9TIAX2sHCvQpwfWYSu6IjkTWYrst
g3zgo0cJw7PFKnBxJIzBo7h9+0qRU5ZcFHhyLAiXVckRMY87FIOg8M3o0qtILLWF
++eaKNZVLjvH7PxZm2MtldDBfjKSxVK4QvTs9JzYLMZt5TvuT8H8VkfD0BEFDmMO
gqAuPOOcqXWELniMOtX5wuUB6K2z7ml46z2z63pQwsllV85bzKphRq69wYzhzyU=
=kPas
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----