Discuss mailing list

["Panesar, Amrit" <apanesar AT 4195tech.com>]

Haha, indeed and so far human nature has yet to surprise me, people
are assholes. TQP clearly doesn't care weather our data goes out, on
to the internet, 'naked' or not. It seems that they just want to make
a quick buck - and even in 6 years, I don't believe they will be able
to sue every single person that has come in contact with their
technology and further emphasizes my idea that software patents should
be abolished :P

However, we shouldn't let that deter us from considering the
possibility of a censorship-free DNS system

On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Peter Green <peter AT greenpete.free> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> That's spooky, I was just reading this...
>
> http://it.slashdot.org/story/12/11/12/1237237/meet-the-lawyer-suing-anyone-who-uses-ssl?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Slashdot%2Fslashdot+%28Slashdot%29
>
> Peter
>
>
> On 12/11/12 17:55, Panesar, Amrit wrote:
>> I have come across a theory for universal, direct DNS especially
>> for those behind company or country bound firewalls.
>>
>> I have recently come across SSHTTP
>> (https://github.com/stealth/sshttp). This program multiplexes HTTP
>> SSL with SSH because of banners, (there is a more in-depth
>> explanation on the project page). This would allow an SSH daemon to
>> run on the same port as HTTP-SSL, and essentially 'trick' level 7
>> content filters that establish a connection to the website to
>> ensure it passes content validation, else it resets the connection.
>> (eg: http://i.imgur.com/bQuk3.png & http://i.imgur.com/97LWK.png).
>> What we are to do is mux a clean SSL site with SSH; thus, when the
>> firewall goes to probe the site, it returns a valid site and we
>> will also be able to SSH. With the help of your favorite ssh
>> client, we can tunnel your DNS packets over SSH on port 443 and be
>> able to evade all firewalls that stand in the way thus giving
>> everyone access to OpenNIC. We can even take it a step further and
>> add a SSH client-helper to a web browser (like chromium/canary) to
>> further integrate the experience.
>>
>> What are you thoughts on this?
>>
>>
>> Also I find this comedic, http://i.imgur.com/BSZgI.png
>>
>>
>> -------- You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You may
>> unsubscribe by emailing
>> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQoTiiAAoJEPBKqeCz72c57RgH/RhcxvVtVwgp3FSdw+k3f1Iz
> nd9mfE8YY0RzlVzir/WBPE793BcSvypSIRwc2piFLRLkPNypaGov+ZIKpMBVWz8B
> oJcktm0h6M9ZYXDneBgLIhhpOzoq5NLs5n8PmOMgnikVNI/ECnEVWJEd1Ws29KQJ
> CtjxDnG12hrc6C/ygHbLrAReOd9D0z8LxM4A7LagKHK3tp9GjYrmCi0/qJdJVdcY
> dzgr6sP9ui2/qaicNPaTgaWdi5yZ1sKVVIJR9B9dR5dK9x15idGarjGxvefSRjEM
> VunS5UK1nSH6lKEZ/hn6taaU9E3UG7Vzm4pj+O/vc5UYDYINbZy+TIYelQDJVR0=
> =y806
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org