Discuss mailing list

[webmaster AT blockaid.me]

So far as complete circumvention goes, that process is manual. But detecting the seizures is all automatic.

Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone on O2

---

From: Psilo <dns AT psilo.org>

Sender: dodot63 AT gmail.com

Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2012 20:00:09 +0100

To: <discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org>

ReplyTo: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] European domain seizures

So the process is entirely manual today, right?

Le 2 déc. 2012 17:47, <webmaster AT blockaid.me> a écrit :

It doesn't require them to opt-in per se, but it sure helps.

If we don't get cooperation, we have to work out the dns records the best we can. Its easier if site owners do it themselves.

Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone on O2

---

From: Psilo <dns AT psilo.org>

Sender: dodot63 AT gmail.com

Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2012 16:45:11 +0100

To: <discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org>

ReplyTo: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] European domain seizures

As I understood, blockaid requires the domain owner to opt in, right?

Why is that ? Don't you have too few domains hosted?

Le 2 déc. 2012 15:36, "Web Master" <webmaster AT blockaid.me> a écrit :

That's exactly what we do at BlockAid. We have the ability to detect when domains are seized and then circumvent the seizure where necessary.

And we also slave OpenNic domains, so you get the best of both worlds.

Apologies for the shameless advertising.

On 2 Dec 2012 12:58, "Psilo" <dns AT psilo.org> wrote:

That is simply not acceptable. Don't mess with our internet.

Would it be possible to retrieve the original DNS entries for seized domains?

If we could do so, I am convinced we should host seized domains.

Ultimately, if we could detect seized domains or retrieve an updated list somewhere, then retrieve the original DNS entries, and host all of them, that would give OpenNIC a lot of credit as an alternative root, and fight this seizure practice.

Internet does not belong to Hollywood, it belongs to all of us.

Le 1 déc. 2012 23:51, "Peter Green" <peter AT greenpete.free> a écrit :

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ha ha, yes of course, I see your point.

Mine was simply that the corporate powers that be are flexing their
muscles again and in new territory.

I see in the comments of that article that OpenNIC is mentioned and
the points about being underground are interesting on at least a
couple of levels.

Peter


On 01/12/12 22:42, kbenjamin Coplon wrote:
> no, it's a big opportunity
>
>
> -------- You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You may
> unsubscribe by emailing
> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQuoi7AAoJEPBKqeCz72c5DdkH/RsLDwKpP+ted0lcqe+rmHAB
f51Fb5JC1wmr+o2a8XBq9I2RIFFJKAkcn6IQjBneKLfMb+LrJ3o7o/BOIkgqthop
vGeJxMYOb925el9JPUorSihGTgG4EuufZvgJg1dJhTot52kECaAcjjPhWCV/Gz2A
A2Jp6BDxhaPi346ln72hP3Ia7CL0iVkBargT2m2b97aJ3r/fgOpumgaRL/1TAnZi
UDuOfv6IRvhjJleMPqcIObQ1GPfNmEeq+I893dUdXRmV28WxkrsXFw22McjhcJVM
9irI/GUucx2yqZVERYhdAGmHPC87xDOTaUjpSlLsVgIjo9xixd1ZVs4E3N+PbG4=
=CgNX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org