Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] [TLD Suggestion] .tiny

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] [TLD Suggestion] .tiny


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Travis McCrea <me AT travismccrea.com>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] [TLD Suggestion] .tiny
  • Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 17:55:13 -0500

can it be .t or .l?

Bjorn Peeters wrote:
> I don't often speak on the list, but with this one i'd like to chip in :)
> I'm FOR the idea of a "shortener" or linking tld.
> but i'd go with a .lnk tld instead of .url / .uri
>
> .tiny is way to big to be tiny :)
>
>
>
> On 02/14/2013 10:06 PM, Guillaume Parent wrote:
>> Would .url or .uri work? Does that clash with any open ICANN
>> proposals? That'd be either one or two characters shorter, depending.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Guillaume Parent
>> <gparent AT gparent.org <mailto:gparent AT gparent.org>> wrote:
>>
>> Maybe they are, I'm just sharing my opinion anyway.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Lenny Guy <openmailf AT gmail.com
>> <mailto:openmailf AT gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> It would be only for inside use.
>>
>> BTW. I thought 1 letter TLDs were prohibited in OpenNIC.
>>
>> So other example: as032.t or custom.t
>>
>>
>> 2013/2/14 Guillaume Parent <gparent AT gparent.org
>> <mailto:gparent AT gparent.org>>
>>
>> Why would people use a.tiny/t or a.tiny/ when they can
>> use is.gd/a <http://is.gd/a> ?
>>
>> The TLD would be otherwise worthwhile for OpenNIC-only
>> services, but if it's supposed to be used by the grand
>> public, then something with the minimum amount of
>> characters would be better (dumb example: a.b)
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Lenny Guy
>> <openmailf AT gmail.com <mailto:openmailf AT gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> >You want to make a URL shortener TLD but you want to
>> make it longer than what's already out there? If it's
>> not one one letter long, don't make it.
>> What?
>>
>>
>> 2013/2/14 Guillaume Parent <gparent AT gparent.org
>> <mailto:gparent AT gparent.org>>
>>
>> You want to make a URL shortener TLD but you want
>> to make it longer than what's already out there?
>> If it's not one one letter long, don't make it.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:25 AM, NovaKing
>> <novaking AT eztv.se <mailto:novaking AT eztv.se>> wrote:
>>
>> I think a TLD purely for a url shortener is a
>> bit overkill, but that’s just me.
>>
>>
>>
>> In other news, now that I have moved and are
>> buying more servers / ips I plan to focus
>> more on .key/.p2p in the near future, will
>> probably talk to you guys more about it on
>> IRC though.
>>
>>
>>
>> NovaKing
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:*discuss-request AT lists.opennicproject.org
>> <mailto:discuss-request AT lists.opennicproject.org>
>> [mailto:discuss-request AT lists.opennicproject.org
>> <mailto:discuss-request AT lists.opennicproject.org>]
>> *On Behalf Of *Lenny Guy
>> *Sent:* Thursday, 14 February 2013 10:13 PM
>> *To:* discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
>> <mailto:discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org>
>> *Subject:* Re: [opennic-discuss] [TLD
>> Suggestion] .tiny
>>
>>
>>
>> But .micro does not work like shortener script.
>>
>>
>>
>> 2013/2/14 teamcoltra AT gmail.com
>> <mailto:teamcoltra AT gmail.com>
>> <teamcoltra AT gmail.com
>> <mailto:teamcoltra AT gmail.com>>
>>
>> There is already .micro
>>
>> On Feb 14, 2013 4:07 AM, "Lenny Guy"
>> <openmailf AT gmail.com
>> <mailto:openmailf AT gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Like before, I don't have infrastructure to
>> operate TLD, I'll share with you my suggestion.
>>
>>
>>
>> .tiny / .ant
>>
>>
>>
>> What it will be?
>>
>> - TLD for shortentning links, like - as1.tiny
>> (random characters). Shortening service will
>> be at register.tiny.
>>
>>
>>
>> How it will work?
>>
>> - Like other TLDs.
>>
>>
>>
>> I hope you'll like it :D
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page