discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
RE: [opennic-discuss] Fwd: Fwd: ICANN News Alert -- Security Studies on the Use of Non-Delegated TLDs, and Dotless Names
Chronological Thread
- From: "John Kozlowski \(ShofarDomain.com\)" <John.Kozlowski AT ShofarDomain.com>
- To: <discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org>
- Subject: RE: [opennic-discuss] Fwd: Fwd: ICANN News Alert -- Security Studies on the Use of Non-Delegated TLDs, and Dotless Names
- Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 08:50:11 -0400
Simply put ‘www.opennicproject.org.' is not while “org.” or the TLD alone is.
The issue is inconsistences in resolving the TLD alone. The example they give is using the TLD directly for an email such as “joe@org”. While some may resolve this fine, others will reject it due to the missing dot.
The term dotless is confusing and I can’t help think that that is on purpose. It is simply the TLD.
From: discuss-request AT lists.opennicproject.org [mailto:discuss-request AT lists.opennicproject.org] On Behalf Of Peter Green
Hi all, |
- [opennic-discuss] Fwd: Fwd: ICANN News Alert -- Security Studies on the Use of Non-Delegated TLDs, and Dotless Names, Julian DeMarchi, 05/28/2013
- RE: [opennic-discuss] Fwd: Fwd: ICANN News Alert -- Security Studies on the Use of Non-Delegated TLDs, and Dotless Names, John Kozlowski (ShofarDomain.com), 05/29/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Fwd: Fwd: ICANN News Alert -- Security Studies on the Use of Non-Delegated TLDs, and Dotless Names, Peter Green, 05/29/2013
- RE: [opennic-discuss] Fwd: Fwd: ICANN News Alert -- Security Studies on the Use of Non-Delegated TLDs, and Dotless Names, John Kozlowski (ShofarDomain.com), 05/29/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Fwd: Fwd: ICANN News Alert -- Security Studies on the Use of Non-Delegated TLDs, and Dotless Names, Quinn Wood, 05/29/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.