discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: Guillaume Parent <gparent AT gparent.org>
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] First ICANN, Now Spamhaus
- Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 14:44:06 +0000
I suggest we start mailing out these people and try to find out their
intentions on what would make you criminally liable.
Our service cannot survive without recursion and it is clearly not a mistake.
-gp
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 12:58:51AM -0600, Quinn Wood wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Daniel Quintiliani <danq AT runbox.com>
> wrote:
> > 'Once they know it can be used for attacks and fraud, that should be an
> > offense,' Cox said. 'You should be subject to something like a parking
> > ticket... where the fine is greater than the cost of fixing it."
> >
> Why not fine the people administering those zones with 4K TXT records
> who are actually at fault. If they really need records that size, why
> can't they rate limit queries?
>
> This is the equivalent of suggesting a lawsuit against a parking
> garage after I checked out my Formula 100 racecar and let a stranger
> take it for a joyride.
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
- [opennic-discuss] First ICANN, Now Spamhaus, Daniel Quintiliani, 11/27/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] First ICANN, Now Spamhaus, Quinn Wood, 11/28/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] First ICANN, Now Spamhaus, Guillaume Parent, 11/28/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] First ICANN, Now Spamhaus, Simon, 11/28/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] First ICANN, Now Spamhaus, Quinn Wood, 11/28/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.