discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: Anner van Hardenbroek <dwlnetnl AT gmail.com>
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Subject: [opennic-discuss] .pirate voting
- Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2014 07:23:39 +0200
Hi all OpenNIC people,
I reading the threads with astonishment. What's the right way of voting, by
which rules we are voting, is it all in place to inform all what to vote
about exactly, are the underlying technical systems in place and operational?
There is purposed to wait 7 days for a cool down. I think that's a great
idea. But maybe 14 days, maybe a whole month is better? Get everything in
order, all technical stuff working, the whole team of administrators and
leaders in place and ready for it-as the organizing people envision it,
document it all by charter on the wiki and inform all channels properly what
to vote on, what, when and where.
In the OpenNIC history there were votes on the mailing list in an organized
manner. Some reactions in form of yes/no with a statement, some by citing and
"+1". It's the job of the organizer to keep track and publish the results
which should be self-evident because everyone can read it in the thread.
I see no reason to suspend and cool down for 14 days, publish on day 15 and
vote by mailing list thread on, let's say, day 18.
Kind regard,
Anner
- [opennic-discuss] .pirate voting, Anner van Hardenbroek, 04/06/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .pirate voting, Quinn Wood, 04/06/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.