Discuss mailing list

[Quinn Wood <wood.quinn.s AT gmail.com>]

Also,

On Sunday, April 6, 2014, subhuman <discipline AT gmx.net> wrote:
> In order to implement your approach we need clear rules for
> a) the formal requirements for a proposal: what is a valid proposal?
> b) the personal requirements for a proposal: is the proponent entitled to this proposal?
> c) the requirements with regards to content: is this proposal relevant?
> d) the requirements with regards to wording: is the wording clear and unambiguous?
>

My proposal was intended to address that. Whoops. Well the four bullets I had are the intended valid format:

Abstract, briefly explain the proposal

Necessity, identify the problem

Effective, show how you propose solving it and what the outcome will be

Proportionate, list any new problems that will be created if this proposal is executed

It should be fairly universal for proposals we'll get. How's that for A?

I think the community can and should decide on B as-needed, as well as D, the way we're organized right now. Comments

 I don't know what you mean by C.