Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal: Changes to Voting Procedures

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal: Changes to Voting Procedures


Chronological Thread 
  • From: subhuman <discipline AT gmx.net>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal: Changes to Voting Procedures
  • Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2014 09:12:52 +0200

On Sun, 6 Apr 2014 01:53:49 -0500
Quinn Wood <wood.quinn.s AT gmail.com> wrote:

> > If the motion to table fails, the discussion and potentially voting
> continue. If the motion to table succeeds, the proposal- potentially
> temporarily- dies. Does that answer your question?
No it doesn't. In your flow chart an insufficient proposal gets moved to
table. if this motion is not seconded, the proposal shall be voted upon
without prior discusion inspite of its incompleteness or other flaws.
The point is that there is no necessity for this motion at all. If a proposal
is found out to be insufficient it gets tabled period. And if the proponent
decides to work on it and enhances it and makes it fit for another submittal,
the same decision process will be applied. Otherwise it remains collecting
dust until finally someone decides to drop it.
I think you're mixing formal decisions with those regarding individual
contents. Or was it I who got you wrong?


--
The only cure to the evils of Democracy is more Democracy.
http://amishrakefight.org/gfy/images/fword.mp3



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page