discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: Theo B <me AT theos.space>
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Review of defunct alternate top level domains
- Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2016 21:10:29 -0500
We can't take .online though because that is an ICANN gTLD that currently accepts registrations.
On Dec 4, 2016 8:59 PM, "Jonah Aragon" <jonaharagon AT gmail.com> wrote:
Note the wiki page I mentioned in the original post.JonahOn Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 7:51 PM <spaesani AT mail.com> wrote:Jonah, how did you get a list of their TLDs ?
--
Sunday, 04 December 2016, 01:46PM -05:00 from Jonah Aragon <jonaharagon AT gmail.com>:
Sent from myMail app for AndroidI think we should review as a community the top level domains that were created by now-defunct alternate roots such as AlterNIC and Pacific Root that OpenNIC has officially decided to not conflict with even after their disbandment (according to http://wiki.opennicproject.org/AlternateNICs). It is my opinion that many of these could prove useful as additions to our namespace, but under our current policy we prohibit applications because of their prior status. Many of these zones have been offline for over a decade and can't be reasonably reclaimed at this point by their original issuers in my opinion, and should be open to potential future TLD applicants.The top level domains I'm calling into question are as follows:
- exp
- llc
- lnx
- ltd
- med
- nic
- noc
- porn
- xxx
- fcn
- ais
- bali
- belize
- bio
- cal
- career
- chem
- children
- costarica
- ind
- job
- lib
- medic
- nomad
- npo
- ppp
- sat
- satcom
- satnet
- scuba
- socal
- stream
- work
- www
- biz
- cars
- corp
- etc
- family
- food
- jobs
- ocean
- men
- ngo
- not
- online
- wine
- women
I realize a few of these are currently in use by ICANN (.biz, for example) and those should definitely not be used on the OpenNIC network, but other domains (.nic, .llc) are not currently in use by any parties, and I think that any future applications for their namespace should be allowed.Jonah--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
- [opennic-discuss] Review of defunct alternate top level domains, Jonah Aragon, 12/04/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Review of defunct alternate top level domains, Theo Bleier, 12/04/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Review of defunct alternate top level domains, Jonah Aragon, 12/04/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Review of defunct alternate top level domains, spaesani, 12/04/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Review of defunct alternate top level domains, Jonah Aragon, 12/04/2016
- Message not available
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Review of defunct alternate top level domains, Theo B, 12/04/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Review of defunct alternate top level domains, Maiyannah Bishop, 12/04/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Review of defunct alternate top level domains, Theo B, 12/04/2016
- Message not available
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Review of defunct alternate top level domains, Jonah Aragon, 12/04/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Review of defunct alternate top level domains, Theo Bleier, 12/04/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Review of defunct alternate top level domains, Simon Castano, 12/06/2016
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Review of defunct alternate top level domains, an0n1, 12/05/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Review of defunct alternate top level domains, simple, 12/05/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.