discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: an0n1 AT riseup.net
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Review of defunct alternate top level domains
- Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 23:43:03 +0100
- Importance: Normal
>> I particularly believe etc, exp, ind, lib, lnx, (think Linux), nic,
nomad, not, online, stream, & www (if not ICANN's property, it could find
use as an interesting reversal of/to site naming & usage), would all be of
value (monetary or otherwise).
> I think we should review as a community the top level domains that were
created by now-defunct alternate roots such as AlterNIC and Pacific Root
that OpenNIC has officially decided to not conflict with even after their
> disbandment (according to http://wiki.opennicproject.org/AlternateNICs).
It
> is my opinion that many of these could prove useful as additions to our
namespace, but under our current policy we prohibit applications because of
> their prior status. Many of these zones have been offline for over a
decade
> and can't be reasonably reclaimed at this point by their original
issuers
> in my opinion, and should be open to potential future TLD applicants.
The top level domains I'm calling into question are as follows:
> - exp
> - llc
> - lnx
> - ltd
> - med
> - nic
> - noc
> - porn
> - xxx
> - fcn
> - ais
> - bali
> - belize
> - bio
> - cal
> - career
> - chem
> - children
> - costarica
> - ind
> - job
> - lib
> - medic
> - nomad
> - npo
> - ppp
> - sat
> - satcom
> - satnet
> - scuba
> - socal
> - stream
> - work
> - www
> - biz
> - cars
> - corp
> - etc
> - family
> - food
> - jobs
> - ocean
> - men
> - ngo
> - not
> - online
> - wine
> - women
> I realize a few of these are currently in use by ICANN (.biz, for
example)
> and those should definitely not be used on the OpenNIC network, but
other
> domains (.nic, .llc) are not currently in use by any parties, and I
think
> that any future applications for their namespace should be allowed.
Jonah
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing
> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
- [opennic-discuss] Review of defunct alternate top level domains, Jonah Aragon, 12/04/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Review of defunct alternate top level domains, Theo Bleier, 12/04/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Review of defunct alternate top level domains, Jonah Aragon, 12/04/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Review of defunct alternate top level domains, spaesani, 12/04/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Review of defunct alternate top level domains, Jonah Aragon, 12/04/2016
- Message not available
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Review of defunct alternate top level domains, Theo B, 12/04/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Review of defunct alternate top level domains, Maiyannah Bishop, 12/04/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Review of defunct alternate top level domains, Theo B, 12/04/2016
- Message not available
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Review of defunct alternate top level domains, Jonah Aragon, 12/04/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Review of defunct alternate top level domains, Theo Bleier, 12/04/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Review of defunct alternate top level domains, Simon Castano, 12/06/2016
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Review of defunct alternate top level domains, an0n1, 12/05/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Review of defunct alternate top level domains, simple, 12/05/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.