Discuss mailing list

[Mike Wille <mike AT wille.io>]

What is "Nazi content"? I googled it and the "only reasonable problem" with "Nazi content" was violence.

Famous example: "Reddit bans Nazi boards in crackdown on ‘violent’ content" => https://www.theverge.com/2017/10/25/16548958/reddit-ban-nazi-subreddit-violence-policy-change

I quote: "Reddit has shut down several Nazi and white supremacist subreddits after a policy change banning material that “encourages, glorifies, incites, or calls for violence or physical harm against an individual or a group of people.”"

I think the word "nazi" is dead and means nothing anymore. Violence on the other hand is the real problem here. And as the .front people already mentioned, they concentrate more on violence (which is good IMO). Furthermore I like their answer to Al Beanos great question: "How would you respond to National Socialist content, or incitements to violence?". I would vote yes if there was a vote soon.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen / with best regards,

Mike Lennart Wille, wille.io

E-Mail:  mike AT wille.io

PGP-Key: wille.io/pgp

This email may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended addressee, or if the information provided in this email (including any attachments) is evidently not destined for you, kindly inform us promptly and delete the message received in error (including any attachments) by erasing it from all your computers and other storage devices or media and destroying any hard copies thereof. Any unauthorized processing, forwarding, disclosure, distribution, divulgation, storage, printout or other use of this message or its attachment is prohibited. If your system is infected or otherwise bugged by any virus that is carried by this email, we disclaim any liability whatsoever for the ensuing loss or damage unless caused by our intention or gross negligence.

2017-11-02 9:53 GMT+01:00 Al Beano <albino AT autistici.org>:

Nazi content is illegal in many countries in which opennic operates though, how do you deal with that?

On 1 November 2017 16:20:04 GMT+00:00, Gitgud Software <gitgud AT tfwno.gf> wrote:
>Just to add to verax's response a bit, we'll respond to National
>Socialist content the same way we would Anarchist or Communist content.
>Any special scrutiny given any ideology as a whole would violate the
>premise and spirit of our charter, and threaten our ability to
>impartially govern the project and its registrants use of the name
>space.
>
>Sites and their owners will be dealt with as individuals. Refer to
>verax on what activity or request constitute grounds for intervention.
>
>On Wed, 2017-11-01 at 10:59 -0400, Verax wrote:
>> Al Beano wrote:
>> > How would you respond to National Socialist content, or incitements
>> > to
>>
>> violence?
>> >
>>
>> "Incitement of violence" is a rather nebulous term that could be
>> applied
>> to just about anything.  I've personally made many sarcastic remarks
>> that could fit the description.  A great many social movements
>> through
>> history also would fit the bill, even ones we have holidays for.
>>
>> The last few years have shown us many self-proclaimed "free
>> countries"
>> such as the US, Australia, Germany, Britain, etc. have all started to
>> use whatever pretense to clamp down on otherwise legal and socially
>> acceptable behavior, such as journalists doing their job, or people
>> making fun of politicians on the internet (how dare they).
>>
>> Our intention is to deal with legal take-down orders, blatantly
>> illegal
>> content, and abuse of computer systems (botnets and the like).  If
>> someone wants to be angry on the internet, or be an internet nazi,
>> then
>> that's their problem.  It's not as though anyone is stopping them
>> from
>> doing that on ICANN domains anyways.
>>
>> --Verax
>>
>> > On 1 November 2017 00:47:38 GMT+00:00, gitgud <gitgud AT tfwno.gf>
>> > wrote:
>> > > Greetings from .chan,
>> > >
>> > > As we wrap up our infrastructure changes and finalize the
>> > > installation
>> > > of Regano registration system for our inaugural top level domain,
>> > > we
>> > > have decided to propose another top level domain for our
>> > > organization
>> > > to
>> > > administrate, operate, and govern. We hereby propose the creation
>> > > of
>> > > .front, a top level domain where all may freely voice and promote
>> > > their
>> > > political views. The intention of .front would be to provide a
>> > > non-partisan safe haven for political activists, journalists, and
>> > > organizers, where they may publish web content freely without
>> > > fear of
>> > > censorship or reprisal by their domain registrar. This new top-
>> > > level
>> > > domain will share administrative resources and infrastructure
>> > > with the
>> > > already extant .chan project. Appended below is our charter; we
>> > > appreciate any suggestions you may have about how we can best
>> > > govern
>> > > this project, and will attempt to answer any questions you may
>> > > have
>> > > regarding this proposal. We look forward to your input and
>> > > support for
>> > > this proposal.
>> > >
>> > > Happy Halloween,
>> > > .chan
>> > >
>> > > =======================.FRONT CHARTER STARTS
>> > > HERE=======================
>> > >
>> > > ==Charter==
>> > > .front is a top level domain established for communities,
>> > > movements,
>> > > organizations, and people involved in politics. The .front TLD is
>> > > created to offer a free, non-partisan, and open namespace for
>> > > registrants to host blogs, forums, news publications, and other
>> > > commentary on politics and society.
>> > >
>> > > ==Eligibility==
>> > > An eligible individual for registration is defined as any
>> > > individual
>> > > that has not been banned from .front domain registration. An
>> > > eligible
>> > > individual for voting is defined as any individual that has not
>> > > been
>> > > banned from .front domain registration and has an email with at
>> > > least
>> > > one domain registered to it.
>> > >
>> > > ==Registration==
>> > > Registration is available to all eligible individuals. An
>> > > individual
>> > > may
>> > > register a domain on the behalf of any non-human entity, and for
>> > > the
>> > > purposes of this charter is entitled to the rights, as well as
>> > > held to
>> > > the restrictions, of a singular person. Registrants are asked to
>> > > only
>> > > register domain names they intend to use; attempts to “domain
>> > > park” or
>> > > otherwise hoard domains will be scrutinized and may result in the
>> > > revocation of your domain registrations, registration
>> > > eligibility, and
>> > > voting eligibility.
>> > >
>> > > ==Voting==
>> > > All eligible individuals with a registered domain will be
>> > > entitled to
>> > > one vote on major organizational decisions. A proposal to vote on
>> > > may
>> > > be
>> > > put forward by any individual or group of individuals. From then
>> > > on,
>> > > the
>> > > .front community may discuss and propose amendment to the
>> > > original
>> > > proposal. The administration reserves the right to determine
>> > > whether or
>> > > not a proposal is of major concern, and may at their discretion
>> > > dismiss
>> > > any trivial or impossible proposals, as well as any proposals
>> > > that
>> > > conflict with the stated purpose of the .front domain. Provided
>> > > the
>> > > administration has not already dismissed the proposal, the
>> > > individual
>> > > originating the proposal may put the proposal to vote or drop the
>> > > proposal. Should the proposal be put to vote, all members will
>> > > have 72
>> > > hours from the moment the proposal was put to vote to cast a
>> > > “Yay” or
>> > > “Nay” vote on the proposal. After 72 hours, all absent votes will
>> > > be
>> > > registered as abstentions and the winner will be determined by a
>> > > simple
>> > > majority of all non-abstaining voters. Once the results have been
>> > > announced, the proposal will go into effect as policy and will be
>> > > enforced by the relevant individuals in the organization.
>> > >
>> > > ==Anonymity==
>> > > In recognition of the special nature of the community and
>> > > demographic
>> > > this organization is chartering a domain for, this organization
>> > > will
>> > > allow all individuals to register and vote without proof of
>> > > identity or
>> > > a real name. The sole criteria for to be considered a voting
>> > > member of
>> > > the organization will be an email address with one or more
>> > > registered,
>> > > non-revoked domains, belonging to a singular person. Should
>> > > blatant
>> > > abuse of said anonymity be discovered, their eligibility as a
>> > > registrant
>> > > and voter will be revoked. The offenders will not have their
>> > > eligibility
>> > > to vote or register a domain reinstated. Abuse includes
>> > > “sock-puppeting”, Sybil attacks, and other similar methods of
>> > > social
>> > > subversion.
>> > >
>> > > ==Amendment==
>> > > Provided the proposal in question does not bring this document in
>> > > conflict with OpenNIC Policy, this document may be edited or
>> > > amended by
>> > > a proposal should the proposal to do so pass.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > ---------
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --------
>> > > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
>> > > You may unsubscribe by emailing
>> > > discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --------
>> > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
>> > You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicpr
>> > oject.org
>> >
>>
>> --------
>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
>> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproj
>> ect.org
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>--------
>You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>You may unsubscribe by emailing
>discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org




--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org