Discuss mailing list

[Christopher <weblionx AT gmail.com>]

1) Yes
2) Yes
3) Yes
4) No
5) No
6) Yes

Would vote yes for #4 if it was for TLD votes only.
Though I like most of #5 it has some quirks I'm not comfortable with.


On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 8:53 PM, Jonah Aragon <jonah AT triplebit.net> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> This vote is on the changes proposed at
> https://lists.opennicproject.org/sympa/arc/discuss/2017-10/msg00135.html.
> The vote on adding these changes to the official OpenNIC policies will end
> on November 14, 2017 at 6:00 PM UTC.
>
> IMPORTANT, READ BEFORE VOTING: This vote is split up into 6 sections, which
> may be passed individually (they do not depend on each other). You should
> vote YES or NO on every section individually in an ordered list 1 through 6.
> This is an effort to get the portions the community most wants passed while
> keeping open the possibility of dropping certain topics that may require
> more discussion. If your reply contains only a single YES or NO, your vote
> will be counted as either YES or NO for all 6 sections proposed,
> respectively. Each of the six sections are labeled as such in the original
> proposal.
>
> Here’s a brief summary of the proposal, for your convenience. You should
> read the full proposal linked above prior to voting.
>
> - Very clear voting outcome requirements. Certain votes may now require more
> than the simple majority of votes that were required for any proposals in
> the past.
> - Clarified TLD proposal requirements. This should ensure an operator’s
> setup is configured prior to a proposal, and outline what exactly is
> necessary for any operator.
> - Voting and formal discussion threads posted to this list now have a very
> clear format that MUST be followed. This will prevent confusion on what the
> original poster is expecting from the community.
> - Formal discussions now have a strict minimum time requirement to be active
> before a vote can be pushed to the list. Voting threads now have very clear
> deadlines.
> - DNS operators now have certain minimum requirements to meet to keep the
> ability to operate key infrastructure components.
> - FUTURE peered networks now have requirements to meet before we enter an
> agreement with them.
>
> Jonah
>
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>