Discuss mailing list

["Daniel Quintiliani" <danq AT runbox.com>]

You do not need to include opinions on the person in the proposal.

Perhaps I should add at the end:

"These rules are only applicable to proposals put up for vote, not to mailing 
list discussion."

--

-Dan Q

On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 18:17:19 +0000, Philipp Schafft <lion AT lion.leolix.org> 
wrote:

> Good evening,
> 
> On Tue, 2018-07-31 at 12:09 -0400, Daniel Quintiliani wrote:
> > OpenNIC proposals should not be used to target specific members and
> > give opinions about their character or actions. Jonah's upcoming
> > proposal to invalidate the ongoing vote (which I have no control over,
> > and would stop if I could) makes references to "Daniel Q." along with
> > the phrase "sane recount" and accusations of myself engaging in
> > "misleading" behavior.
> > 
> > These defamatory "troll votes" have no place in OpenNIC and if that
> > first paragraph is included as is, the whole purpose of the vote
> > becomes a personal attack on me and accusation of me engaging in
> > fraudulent, potentially illegal activity.
> 
> So you decided to do exactly what he did as counter attack?
> Writing a "PROPOSAL" that is a direct reaction to his "PROPOSAL"
> attacking him, trying to render his "PROPOSAL" invalid and/or void?
> 
> Good job.
> 
> > This is my proposal, yea/nay, which will be put up to vote on
> > 8/7/2018:
> > 
> > OpenNIC proposals shall not contain, in full or in part, language
> > which:
> > 
> > * Praises an OpenNIC member on basis of their character or actions,
> > * Condemns an OpenNIC member on basis of their character or actions,
> > * Makes allegations of unethical or illegal activity by an OpenNIC
> > member, unless confirmed by a court of law, and/or
> 
> Ah, there is the "unethical" and "illegal" again I have talked about so
> many times.... Why do people still love them so much?
> 
> 
> > * Criticizes or comments on a proposal or vote, past or present, valid
> > or invalid, in which an OpenNIC member is criticized on basis of their
> > character or actions.
> > 
> > The proposal shall take effect immediately after passing.
> 
> "or actions". So, for example if someone writes an "PROPOSAL" for a new
> TLD it may no longer be considered if that person can actually run the
> TLD (ref: the working registration system requirement that was discussed
> very lengthy).
>