dns-operations AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Dns-operations mailing list
List archive
- From: Jeff Taylor <shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net>
- To: dns-operations AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Subject: Re: [opennic-dns-operations] Discussion for Tier-1 zone master policy
- Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 06:43:56 -0600
No, BIND weighs each entry in the masters list equally. Entries are not taken in any particular order, so either source would be expected to be just as valid.
On 04/27/2014 11:23 PM, Quinn Wood wrote:
On Apr 28, 2014, at 0:09, Jeff Taylor <shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net> wrote:ns0 would only be queried in case of a failure to reach nsX, I believe. At
Would it still provide the same global redundancy that we are trying to
maintain with opennic services?
least I think that's the way BIND behaves, it may be configurable and/or vary
across nameservers.
----
To unsubscribe, email dns-operations-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
- [opennic-dns-operations] Discussion for Tier-1 zone master policy, Jeff Taylor, 04/28/2014
- Re: [opennic-dns-operations] Discussion for Tier-1 zone master policy, Quinn Wood, 04/28/2014
- Re: [opennic-dns-operations] Discussion for Tier-1 zone master policy, Jeff Taylor, 04/28/2014
- Re: [opennic-dns-operations] Discussion for Tier-1 zone master policyy, Brian Koontz, 04/30/2014
- Re: [opennic-dns-operations] Discussion for Tier-1 zone master policy, Jeff Taylor, 04/30/2014
- Re: [opennic-dns-operations] Discussion for Tier-1 zone master policy, Brian Koontz, 04/30/2014
- Re: [opennic-dns-operations] Discussion for Tier-1 zone master policy, Jeff Taylor, 04/30/2014
- Re: [opennic-dns-operations] Discussion for Tier-1 zone master policy, Julian DeMarchi, 04/30/2014
- Re: [opennic-dns-operations] Discussion for Tier-1 zone master policy, Quinn Wood, 04/28/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.