Discuss mailing list

[Dean Gardiner <gardiner91 AT gmail.com>]

Looks good from here now, now we just need to wait for one of the website administrators to confirm its working and add it to the list.

On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:02 AM, ed <ed-opennic AT s5h.net> wrote:

Ah got it, didn't have a full route. Can you retry please?

Thanks

On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 10:38:11AM +1300, Dean Gardiner wrote:
> > server opennic2.s5h.net
> Default Server:  opennic2.s5h.net
> Address:  2a00:1018:801:1000::ec45:4ef2
>
> > ipv6.google.com
> Server:  opennic2.s5h.net
> Address:  2a00:1018:801:1000::ec45:4ef2
>
> DNS request timed out.
>     timeout was 2 seconds.
> DNS request timed out.
>     timeout was 2 seconds.
> *** Request to opennic2.s5h.net timed-out
> > google.com
> Server:  opennic2.s5h.net
> Address:  2a00:1018:801:1000::ec45:4ef2
>
> DNS request timed out.
>     timeout was 2 seconds.
> DNS request timed out.
>     timeout was 2 seconds.
> *** Request to opennic2.s5h.net timed-out
> > opennic.glue
> Server:  opennic2.s5h.net
> Address:  2a00:1018:801:1000::ec45:4ef2
>
> DNS request timed out.
>     timeout was 2 seconds.
> DNS request timed out.
>     timeout was 2 seconds.
> *** Request to opennic2.s5h.net timed-out
> >
>
>
>
> Pinging opennic2.s5h.net [2a00:1018:801:1000::ec45:4ef2] with 32 bytes of
> data:
> Reply from 2a00:1018:801:1000::ec45:4ef2: time=568ms
> Reply from 2a00:1018:801:1000::ec45:4ef2: time=317ms
> Reply from 2a00:1018:801:1000::ec45:4ef2: time=300ms
> Reply from 2a00:1018:801:1000::ec45:4ef2: time=297ms
>
> So I can ping it fine it must be something wrong with DNS Service.
>
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 10:34 AM, ed <ed-opennic AT s5h.net> wrote:
>
> > The only difference with opennic2.s5h.net is that it's been configured
> > by me selecting the IPv6 resolvers as:
> >
> >  2001:470:8388:2:20e:2eff:fe63:d4a9
> >  2001:470:1f0f:48e::2
> >  2001:470:1f10:c6::2
> >  2001:470:8388:10:0:100:53:20
> >  2001:470:1f10:c6::2
> >  2001:470:1f0f:48e::2
> >
> > It appears to work when I query the TLDs, which records were you looking
> > up against it so I can reproduce?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 10:10:38AM +1300, Dean Gardiner wrote:
> > > Thanks for the servers, I've checked the servers and it looks like
> > > opennic1.s5h.net is working but opennic2.s5h.net just brings up
> > timeouts.
> > >
> > > Does someone else want to confirm this though?
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 10:01 AM, ed <ed-opennic AT s5h.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > > > New IPv6 server in Germany:
> > > >
> > > >  opennic2.s5h.net
> > > >
> > > > Any problems, give me a shout please.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Ed http://www.s5h.net/
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > discuss mailing list
> > > > discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
> > > > http://lists.darkdna.net/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > > >
> >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > discuss mailing list
> > > discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
> > > http://lists.darkdna.net/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Ed http://www.s5h.net/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > discuss mailing list
> > discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
> > http://lists.darkdna.net/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >

> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
> http://lists.darkdna.net/mailman/listinfo/discuss


--
Best regards,
Ed http://www.s5h.net/

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
http://lists.darkdna.net/mailman/listinfo/discuss