Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] New tier 2 server

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] New tier 2 server


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Zach Gibbens <infocop411 AT gmail.com>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] New tier 2 server
  • Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 01:46:39 -0500
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=kzrOt/LbUmaYVf7I2hjmgRoe7n1kXCW/HlD0FjD7R52fTYTJK598zh1cOqR4SXIgHV geMCfTpRuPbu6aEQQcw98hZUwPVuji/F1C7WGTVfk8PwuU+6VUbH8OkR7zaXktKUUbG8 TT0hWi6/pdHS4odMUOGjzQ2V8TYp2x8VBOb5w=
  • List-archive: <http://lists.darkdna.net/pipermail/discuss>
  • List-id: <discuss.lists.opennicproject.org>

opennic2.s5h.net still has issues at this moment, however
opennic1.s5h.net is fine
http://opennic.oss/test/t2.php?ip_addr=opennic2.s5h.net

Also If you could give me your name, for the list, and I can add
opennic1.s5h.net
and when opennic2's issues are resolved, I'd gladly add that too
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Dean Gardiner <gardiner91 AT gmail.com> wrote:
> Looks good from here now, now we just need to wait for one of the website
> administrators to confirm its working and add it to the list.
>
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:02 AM, ed <ed-opennic AT s5h.net> wrote:
>>
>> Ah got it, didn't have a full route. Can you retry please?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 10:38:11AM +1300, Dean Gardiner wrote:
>> > > server opennic2.s5h.net
>> > Default Server:  opennic2.s5h.net
>> > Address:  2a00:1018:801:1000::ec45:4ef2
>> >
>> > > ipv6.google.com
>> > Server:  opennic2.s5h.net
>> > Address:  2a00:1018:801:1000::ec45:4ef2
>> >
>> > DNS request timed out.
>> >     timeout was 2 seconds.
>> > DNS request timed out.
>> >     timeout was 2 seconds.
>> > *** Request to opennic2.s5h.net timed-out
>> > > google.com
>> > Server:  opennic2.s5h.net
>> > Address:  2a00:1018:801:1000::ec45:4ef2
>> >
>> > DNS request timed out.
>> >     timeout was 2 seconds.
>> > DNS request timed out.
>> >     timeout was 2 seconds.
>> > *** Request to opennic2.s5h.net timed-out
>> > > opennic.glue
>> > Server:  opennic2.s5h.net
>> > Address:  2a00:1018:801:1000::ec45:4ef2
>> >
>> > DNS request timed out.
>> >     timeout was 2 seconds.
>> > DNS request timed out.
>> >     timeout was 2 seconds.
>> > *** Request to opennic2.s5h.net timed-out
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Pinging opennic2.s5h.net [2a00:1018:801:1000::ec45:4ef2] with 32 bytes
>> > of
>> > data:
>> > Reply from 2a00:1018:801:1000::ec45:4ef2: time=568ms
>> > Reply from 2a00:1018:801:1000::ec45:4ef2: time=317ms
>> > Reply from 2a00:1018:801:1000::ec45:4ef2: time=300ms
>> > Reply from 2a00:1018:801:1000::ec45:4ef2: time=297ms
>> >
>> > So I can ping it fine it must be something wrong with DNS Service.
>> >
>> > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 10:34 AM, ed <ed-opennic AT s5h.net> wrote:
>> >
>> > > The only difference with opennic2.s5h.net is that it's been configured
>> > > by me selecting the IPv6 resolvers as:
>> > >
>> > >  2001:470:8388:2:20e:2eff:fe63:d4a9
>> > >  2001:470:1f0f:48e::2
>> > >  2001:470:1f10:c6::2
>> > >  2001:470:8388:10:0:100:53:20
>> > >  2001:470:1f10:c6::2
>> > >  2001:470:1f0f:48e::2
>> > >
>> > > It appears to work when I query the TLDs, which records were you
>> > > looking
>> > > up against it so I can reproduce?
>> > >
>> > > Thanks
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 10:10:38AM +1300, Dean Gardiner wrote:
>> > > > Thanks for the servers, I've checked the servers and it looks like
>> > > > opennic1.s5h.net is working but opennic2.s5h.net just brings up
>> > > timeouts.
>> > > >
>> > > > Does someone else want to confirm this though?
>> > > >
>> > > > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 10:01 AM, ed <ed-opennic AT s5h.net> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hi All,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > New IPv6 server in Germany:
>> > > > >
>> > > > >  opennic2.s5h.net
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Any problems, give me a shout please.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > --
>> > > > > Best regards,
>> > > > > Ed http://www.s5h.net/
>> > > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > > discuss mailing list
>> > > > > discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
>> > > > > http://lists.darkdna.net/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>> > > > >
>> > >
>> > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > discuss mailing list
>> > > > discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
>> > > > http://lists.darkdna.net/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Best regards,
>> > > Ed http://www.s5h.net/
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > discuss mailing list
>> > > discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
>> > > http://lists.darkdna.net/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>> > >
>>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > discuss mailing list
>> > discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
>> > http://lists.darkdna.net/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Ed http://www.s5h.net/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> discuss mailing list
>> discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
>> http://lists.darkdna.net/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
> http://lists.darkdna.net/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page