discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: Brian Koontz <brian AT pongonova.net>
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] discuss Digest, Vol 5, Issue 35
- Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 18:35:54 -0600
- List-archive: <http://lists.darkdna.net/pipermail/discuss>
- List-id: <discuss.lists.opennicproject.org>
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 05:00:43PM -0600, Larry Brower wrote:
> I have to agree here and also bring up the idea that perhaps T1/2
> servers should comply with RFC 2870 specifically section 2.6
>
>
> 2.6 Root servers MUST answer queries from any internet host, i.e. may
> not block root name resolution from any valid IP address, except
> in the case of queries causing operational problems, in which
> case the blocking SHOULD last only as long as the problem, and be
> as specific as reasonably possible.
Refusing to answer a recursive query is not in violation of the RFC.
And it would be easy to use the "operational problems" clause to
justify blacklisting/whitelisting.
--Brian
- Re: [opennic-discuss] discuss Digest, Vol 5, Issue 35, Jamyn Shanley, 12/28/2010
- Re: [opennic-discuss] discuss Digest, Vol 5, Issue 35, Larry Brower, 12/28/2010
- Re: [opennic-discuss] discuss Digest, Vol 5, Issue 35, Brian Koontz, 12/28/2010
- Re: [opennic-discuss] discuss Digest, Vol 5, Issue 35, Larry Brower, 12/28/2010
- Re: [opennic-discuss] discuss Digest, Vol 5, Issue 35, Brian Koontz, 12/28/2010
- Re: [opennic-discuss] discuss Digest, Vol 5, Issue 35, Larry Brower, 12/28/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.