Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] discuss Digest, Vol 5, Issue 35

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] discuss Digest, Vol 5, Issue 35


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Brian Koontz <brian AT pongonova.net>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] discuss Digest, Vol 5, Issue 35
  • Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 18:35:54 -0600
  • List-archive: <http://lists.darkdna.net/pipermail/discuss>
  • List-id: <discuss.lists.opennicproject.org>

On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 05:00:43PM -0600, Larry Brower wrote:
> I have to agree here and also bring up the idea that perhaps T1/2
> servers should comply with RFC 2870 specifically section 2.6
>
>
> 2.6 Root servers MUST answer queries from any internet host, i.e. may
> not block root name resolution from any valid IP address, except
> in the case of queries causing operational problems, in which
> case the blocking SHOULD last only as long as the problem, and be
> as specific as reasonably possible.

Refusing to answer a recursive query is not in violation of the RFC.
And it would be easy to use the "operational problems" clause to
justify blacklisting/whitelisting.

--Brian




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page