Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC Nameserver with ICANN Domain

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC Nameserver with ICANN Domain


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Alex Hanselka <alex AT hanselka.name>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC Nameserver with ICANN Domain
  • Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 23:14:39 -0500

Ah!

As far as that is concerned, OpenNIC does not do that. I imagine legal
action would be required to get us to remove them as well.

As I am sure you can tell we have servers all over the world and thus
are somewhat protected from that. Also, our servers resolve all of
ICANN and OpenNIC (plus some peers) so there is no downside to using us,
as far as I can tell :P

At least, I think that is what you mean.


RE: Gmail, I finally ditched it for hosting my own email and domain. I
was too afraid at first but I finally trusted myself and it is working
out great! :)

I'm not sure how long you have been with OpenNIC, but welcome none the
less! Let us know if you have any questions :)

Alex


On 3/25/2012 8:25 PM, Quinn Wood wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 20:10, Alex Hanselka <alex AT hanselka.name> wrote:
>>> Ah. Interesting. I'd hoped that this feature would be or become
>>> available to those domain owners that don't want to use DNS servers
>>> that are sometimes less than laissez-faire.
>>>
>>> Not that I have anything to host. Much less anything controversial.
>> I am sort of confused about your concern and even question...
> I am referring types of speech that result in hosting providers or
> domain registrars deciding (for their own safety) to cease and desist
> providing the services they run.
>
> With alternative DNS providers (like OpenNIC) it's possible the DNS
> side of that could be avoided. It's still up to the DNS server owner's
> discretion of course, but it seems less likely to happen there without
> legal process. In addition most domains are centrally USA controlled.
> I'm an American, but... I don't pretend to be happy with all our
> net-legislation attitudes
>
> Those are some of the (no texactly theoretical) concerns that prompted
> me to test-run OpenNIC for a while. As well as the choice of
> anonymity.
>
> By the way sorry about the line wrapping and non-threaded follow ups.
> Gmail is another US services that I should ditch. Or at least grab a
> desktop client.



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page