Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] DRAFT : Peering agreement between OpenNIC and DotBIT

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] DRAFT : Peering agreement between OpenNIC and DotBIT


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Niels Dettenbach (Syndicat IT&Internet)" <nd AT syndicat.com>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] DRAFT : Peering agreement between OpenNIC and DotBIT
  • Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 09:59:24 +0200

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256



Khalahan <khal AT dot-bit.org> schrieb:

>> *Engagements :*
>>
>>
>> - DotBIT reference DNS server will act as a t2 server and reply to
>> OpenNIC zones.
>>
>> - DotBIT will encourage other DNS servers to act as t2 servers.
>>
>> - OpenNIC DNS servers will resolve dotBIT zone(s) : only .bit for
>now.
>
>Any comments ?

...just my little noise at this place:


From my view i would "prefer" the following scenarios:

- - OpenNIC T1 / root is acting as a "limited" T2 for DotBit Namespace (.bit
only for now - further TLDs from DotBit (if will happen) has to be
implemented "by hand" into OpenNIC.

- - DotBit *may* be further used independently around OpenNIC (if there is
any interest in the DotBit community)


Depending from the needs and targets of the DotBit project another scenario
could be to implement DotBit .bit TLD (and possible furthers each by each)
into OpenNIC namespace, but under clean OpenNIC policies. Existing DotBit
server are playing T2 for OpenNIC then.

But this is just my view att...



cheers,


Niels.
- --
Niels Dettenbach
Syndicat IT&Internet
http://www.syndicat.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: APG v1.0.8

iIEEAREIAEEFAk+0r9s6HE5pZWxzIERldHRlbmJhY2ggKFN5bmRpY2F0IElUJklu
dGVybmV0KSA8bmRAc3luZGljYXQuY29tPgAKCRBU3ERlZRyiDZ/BAJ4qDclk6jP/
aGOwuaZm8kT+BNZcBwCeMgDy9UJsjPF23TeYv6TqjArpkH8=
=fDyr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page