Discuss mailing list

[Falk Husemann <josen AT paketsequenz.de>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

Am 19.06.2012 22:20, schrieb Jamyn Shanley:
> In other words, while OpenNIC doesn't actively censor, I don't
> think OpenNIC actively reaches out and forms peering agreements
> with groups that are known to censor the internet. My
> interpretation is that we offer an unfiltered internet, but in
> exchange we expect that peers do the same.

I agree and would not run a stable Server for someone who enters
formal negotiations with a non-democratic nation, at least not for
free. This is, why I run a T2 after all.

But I ask myself, who besides ICANN are possible peering partners for
us, that don't think their root was created by some unproveable godness?

And if some people want to peer with us, how do they do that? Most
providers offer a direct link to a contact form on their startpage for
that purpose. Do we?

And to what would those people have to agree to? Democracy? There are
lots of shades of that.

Maybe we should try to talk to ICANN. I'd say to have them read what
we write we should first contact second tier organizations like ISOC
or present OpenNIC to the national computer science clubs
(Gesellschaft für Informatik it's here). Raise awareness and ask for help.

Greets,
Falk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJP4PKdAAoJEPPG1NATKThtHDMH/iEICWdL6m1y+fpBNAa7VcfC
kQFMBUuYMU2An2u0PqenigKUNtPdVR1IjUb9QJo4QkJq8pGj27KfEkHyi1k8sFSJ
G2gqIGQyH8n74pmXPaaVkOrHL+1oEFniQ9EsPQgeqQRfyF2mX6OKBaG0/qeQ6oag
cJoegt8XXTbru6y45v/0LGbd797rjOiLbDIbAB34AvhV0uwqrguqoB7nRXOyq8aA
jU00VPe5RumQvRsKj5g+L7WAxuW8OXKuT0OMJ9GiRk9wD35M0BNt+WmCbsjSJczv
3NS8BV9bzJsb9rHnvBOW9KkINWY+L8NKpFvB7Ex8Xvq06V1vhcG5Dhnp0iAs5kA=
=uEjH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----