Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] [TLD Suggestion] .tiny

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] [TLD Suggestion] .tiny


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Hunter 9999 <mail AT hunter-9999.de>
  • To: "discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org" <discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org>
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] [TLD Suggestion] .tiny
  • Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 17:09:06 +0100

I think the TLD should describe what you can find there.
Especially if it is an service.
And .! doesn't discribe it.

--

Mit freundlichen Grüßen

Hunter 9999

http://www.piratenpartei.de/
Diese Partei sollte in einer Demokratie überflüssig sein!
Schade, dass es anders ist!

Am 16.02.2013 um 05:15 schrieb Jeff Taylor <shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net>:

> If you *really* want to strain browser compatibility, we could try a TLD
> like .! for tiny links :-)
>
>
> On 02/15/2013 07:10 PM, Hunter 9999 wrote:
>> Am 15.02.2013 um 22:24 schrieb Jeff Taylor <shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net>:
>>> One- and two-letter domain names are prohibited simply as a rule under
>>> each TLD (mostly to prevent land-grabs). I don't think we have any rules
>>> against 1-letter TLDs?
>>>
>>> If this idea gains any traction, I would suggest breaking from convention
>>> and go with something like .0 (zero).
>> Will it work in every browser?
>>
>> Daniel Jäger
>>
>>
>> --------
>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>> You may unsubscribe by emailing
>> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page