Discuss mailing list

[Jeff Taylor <shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net>]

If you want to make comparisons, .ly doesn;t really describe anything
either, yet it doesn't appear that anyone has a problem using bit.ly. 
My point is that once people recognize something, they have no problems
using it.  Sure you could use a descriptive TLD like .short, but that
defeats the purpose.  A tld like .! would be instantly recognizable.

Honestly I don't even know if .! would be compatible with all browsers
or other services, I just think it looks impressive.

On 02/16/2013 09:09 AM, Hunter 9999 wrote:
> I think the TLD should describe what you can find there.
> Especially if it is an service.
> And .! doesn't discribe it.
>