Discuss mailing list

[Maximi89 <maximi89 AT gmail.com>]

what about the DNS servers of OpenNIC? they transmit the data over SSH between them?, because what will happen tomorrow when they decide to block the data between all DNS or spy what they transmit?

2012/11/12 Peter Green <peter AT greenpete.free>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Indeed, and I hope I haven't distracted you or anyone else from your
point :-/

A censorship free D.N.S. system is indeed a worthy objective!

Peter

On 12/11/12 18:07, Panesar, Amrit wrote:
> Haha, indeed and so far human nature has yet to surprise me,
> people are assholes. TQP clearly doesn't care weather our data goes
> out, on to the internet, 'naked' or not. It seems that they just
> want to make a quick buck - and even in 6 years, I don't believe
> they will be able to sue every single person that has come in
> contact with their technology and further emphasizes my idea that
> software patents should be abolished :P
>
> However, we shouldn't let that deter us from considering the
> possibility of a censorship-free DNS system
>
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Peter Green <peter AT greenpete.free>
> wrote:
>

> That's spooky, I was just reading this...
>
> http://it.slashdot.org/story/12/11/12/1237237/meet-the-lawyer-suing-anyone-who-uses-ssl?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Slashdot%2Fslashdot+%28Slashdot%29
>
>  Peter
>
>
> On 12/11/12 17:55, Panesar, Amrit wrote:
>>>> I have come across a theory for universal, direct DNS
>>>> especially for those behind company or country bound
>>>> firewalls.
>>>>
>>>> I have recently come across SSHTTP
>>>> (https://github.com/stealth/sshttp). This program multiplexes
>>>> HTTP SSL with SSH because of banners, (there is a more
>>>> in-depth explanation on the project page). This would allow
>>>> an SSH daemon to run on the same port as HTTP-SSL, and
>>>> essentially 'trick' level 7 content filters that establish a
>>>> connection to the website to ensure it passes content
>>>> validation, else it resets the connection. (eg:
>>>> http://i.imgur.com/bQuk3.png &
>>>> http://i.imgur.com/97LWK.png). What we are to do is mux a
>>>> clean SSL site with SSH; thus, when the firewall goes to
>>>> probe the site, it returns a valid site and we will also be
>>>> able to SSH. With the help of your favorite ssh client, we
>>>> can tunnel your DNS packets over SSH on port 443 and be able
>>>> to evade all firewalls that stand in the way thus giving
>>>> everyone access to OpenNIC. We can even take it a step
>>>> further and add a SSH client-helper to a web browser (like
>>>> chromium/canary) to further integrate the experience.
>>>>
>>>> What are you thoughts on this?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Also I find this comedic, http://i.imgur.com/BSZgI.png
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -------- You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You
>>>> may unsubscribe by emailing
>>>> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>>>>
>>
>>

>> -------- You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You may
>> unsubscribe by emailing
>> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>
>
> -------- You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You may
> unsubscribe by emailing
> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQoTuAAAoJEPBKqeCz72c5juAH/Rxcbx/ZHNlk8IXus26bRbA3
7YfJmY95YDp0YbN4PT74gB+OJemVsEbzW3yj5+arCziSFUGvy67+8z9ERJPKg3cn
R3XofWp557VPSm0jN3Bh2HDX1Fc5iAvJZSyR+sxUukoTRtx6KrVO7cln3+PfsJeE
kwTRyWxhEM4XZffj3IjaRKKj7Do3ACVrZ1KWm4fCe5/5ZlkU4G/t0M0bI/G+k69c
zHau5Sx/CtCbGiVSWguvLqviC5SV31PWW6kDUHbIX/aPdtsyGbO2TTcGIt8J8vUq
r8wW/m+VtSJgxK3JDwf+2ewuwtk4lvQe+xJiRgPtW7wEbOVwtT5BGFIcAGBY7Oc=
=VLf4

-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org

--
Maximiliano Augusto Castañón Araneda
Santiago, Chile
Linux user # 394821

XMPP/Jabber: maximi89 AT gmail.com