discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: "Alex M (Coyo)" <coyo AT darkdna.net>
- To: "discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org" <discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org>
- Subject: [opennic-discuss] Proposal for End-to-End Encrypted Root-Less DNS
- Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 06:10:19 -0500
Okay so, correct me if I'm wrong, but
isn't it possible to have an alternative blockchain for NameCoin that has a much higher difficulty,
let's say only one mined genesis block per three months, and then use that as the TLDs, eliminating
the need for a centralized root.
The significantly high difficulty makes it financially infeasible to squat on TLDs, yet is enough to keep
TLD abuses in check, since there is enough to encourage competition.
For second-level and third level, you'd have normal nameservers like PowerDNS and BIND9, though
I'd strongly suggest implementing DNSSEC + DANE + DNSCurve and a few more enhancements
for privacy and security as a general convention from the outset.
What do you think?
- [opennic-discuss] Proposal for End-to-End Encrypted Root-Less DNS, Alex M (Coyo), 05/24/2013
- RE: [opennic-discuss] Proposal for End-to-End Encrypted Root-Less DNS, John Kozlowski (ShofarDomain.com), 05/24/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal for End-to-End Encrypted Root-Less DNS, Quinn Wood, 05/25/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.