Discuss mailing list

[Andrew <andrew1523 AT gmail.com>]

I don't think we should associate with binary downloads provided by
sourceforge in light of recent events (and past for that matter).

I can't figure out what license this software is released under as well,
it says `other license' and the tarballs had no LICENSE file from my
looks either.

On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 13:02 -0400, Oleg Khovayko wrote:
> UPDATE:
> 
> One my friend suggested me interesting tool right now: 
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/opennicwizard/
> By his words, this took has functionality, very close to my initial 
> proposal.
> I think, you can set link to this tool from OpenNIC main page.
> 
> 
> Brian Koontz wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 12:00:52AM -0400, Oleg Khovayko wrote:
> >> Colleagues,
> >>
> >> I see, our geolocation service works unstable.
> >> More over, after additional thinking, I understand, there is not
> >> needed real geolocation, because of network topology is not 1:1
> >> mapped to geography.
> >> Thus, there is just single real criteria to select a best service -
> >> measure latencies between client and all available OpenNIC T2
> >> servers, and provide to client
> >> report, sorted by latency.
> > We've actually tested this, and it turns out to be somewhat unreliable as
> > well.
> >
> > That said, I favor a weighted score based upon geoIP and latency.  Or,
> > better yet, just two lists:  One based on geo data, the other on latency.
> >
> >    --Brian
> >
> >
> > --------
> > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> > You may unsubscribe by 
> > emailingdiscuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
> 
> 
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org