Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] Fwd: Re: Changes to the ".o" Charter

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] Fwd: Re: Changes to the ".o" Charter


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Daniel Quintiliani" <danq AT runbox.com>
  • To: "discuss" <discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org>
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Fwd: Re: Changes to the ".o" Charter
  • Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2017 19:46:27 -0400 (EDT)

Especially since the .o TLD already exists, and that's not what the
"votation" is on.

--

-Dan Q

On Mon, 2 Oct 2017 16:39:34 -0700, <vv AT cgs.pw> wrote:

> Brutalent, you need to respond to questions regarding
> your own proposal before you start making incomprehensible
> comments on other people's projects. (this is a hint)
>
> Please.
>
> ~ Ole
>
>
> On Tue, 3 Oct 2017 01:22:52 +0200
> Brutalent <brutalent AT email.com> wrote:
>
> > ---------- Messaggio inoltrato ----------
> > Da: "Giuseppe Valenti" <joix85 AT gmail.com>
> > Data: 03/ott/2017 01:21
> > Oggetto: Re: [opennic-discuss] Changes to the ".o" Charter
> > A: <discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org>
> > Cc:
> >
> > O domain? This is a poor tld domain proposal. Hey guys
> > this is an first alternative of ICANN. O. Domain, null
> > domain, bbs domain, pirate domain… Is a game for nerds?
> > I'm shocking…
> >
> > Il 03/ott/2017 01:04, "Jonah Aragon"
> > <jonah AT triplebit.net> ha scritto:
> >
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > I'm updating the charter for ".o" as it was pointed out
> > > to me that the old version was outdated and had some
> > > controversial policies that -- while they were agreed
> > > upon by the community -- no longer made sense for us.
> > >
> > > Here's the final copy, hosted on Google Drive:
> > > ​​
> > > ModernTLD ".o" Charter rev. II
> > > <https://docs.google.com/a/triplebit.net/document/d/1F8D88--qRl8qVE535psYdPkslvHOmuKFoq0S0QbekOc/edit?usp=drive_web>
> > > ​
> > > Here's a basic list of changes from the old charter
> > > (it's still very similar):
> > >
> > > - Removed the clause stating our ability to charge
> > > for domains. Domains are now officially available for
> > > free, in perpetuity.
> > > - Removed statements regarding votes between the
> > > ".o"/ModernTLD domain holding community. All votes
> > > referenced in the document will just take place in this
> > > mailing list, regardless of whether or not an OpenNIC
> > > member holds a domain with us.
> > > - Clarified some of our abuse policies.
> > > - Added a complete list of reserved domains.
> > > - Clarified domain transfers, how the automated
> > > registration panel functions, and how manual email
> > > registrations function.
> > >
> > > The main issue was the money, which wasn't going to
> > > happen anyways, but since that's the case we might as
> > > well make it official.
> > >
> > > This is a formal proposal which will be voted on, since
> > > I'm not going to just change the Charter. Unless there
> > > are objections, *discussion will end on Oct. 7 at 23:00
> > > UTC*, at which point a voting thread will be posted.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --------
> > > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> > > You may unsubscribe by emailing
> > > discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.open nicproject.org
> > >
> > >
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page