discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: Calum McAlinden <calum AT mcalinden.me.uk>
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Future of .bit though OpenNIC
- Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 21:02:51 +0000
Sorry, I have just found the last couple of emails in spam. Also, any idea what has added "***SPAM***" to the subject? It's certainly not my email client.
Mario (admin AT bambusoft.com), I'm not sure what you're asking. OpenNIC simply resolves Namecoin domains by maintaining a server which generates a bind zone file from the decentralised blockchain. The server runs the Namecoin client and a script which generates the zone file from the data. This is a one-way process: the only way OpenNIC users can register a .bit domain is to use the Namecoin wallet software and register it in the blockchain.
I think the best way forward, as Jonah said, would be to have more stringent policies for blacklisting malicious .bit domains on all OpenNIC servers (preferably by never including them in the zone in the first place). At the moment some T2 operators choose to do blacklisting, but don't forget that T1 servers will also be resolving all the domains in the zone.
I or someone else could adapt the script I have written, enabling it to check for an entry in the blacklist file before adding each name to the zonefile.
I would be more than happy to hand over to Jonah if there are no objections as I think the focus on preventing the malicious use of .bit domains on OpenNIC servers while maintaining transparency and democracy is very important.
My current set up is a Debian server running namecoind with a systemd service, BIND9, and a cron job of the Python script. Some occasional modification of the script might be necessary if it stops working.
Does this all sound OK? I would like to leave it at least until tomorrow to check that this is following procedure and nobody has any objections.
Many thanks to all of you for your help.
On 18/12/17 19:51, Jonah Aragon wrote:
You’re correct, you could operate a .bit registrar without operating the OpenNIC .bit server that mirrors the DNS records.
The main reason I want to take over this system is to put some more stringent abuse policies in place, because .bit at the moment is negatively affecting the community. I want to get some policies passed that will let us change that. I don’t necessarily want to operate a registrar at this time, but it wouldn’t affect your ability to do so.
Thoughts?
Jonah
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 1:45 PM Administrador <admin AT bambusoft.com <mailto:admin AT bambusoft.com>> wrote:
The .bazar, .lib, .emc and .coin are served as static-stub (in bind)
here in opennic, there is no operator at all
I am the one who helped Oleg Khovayko with Emercoin-Opennic peering
in 2014, acctually I own the
opennic.bazar, opennic.lib, opennic.emc, opennic.coin domain names
in emercoin namespaces
Also, as Calum pinted out, the .bit peering is just a script that
makes available .bit domains in opennic infrastructure
I think Jonah and I can put a namecoin emercoin wallets and both
serve as independent registrars. The point here is what is the user
status of users relaed to opennic in Calum's systems?
Calum?
Regards
El 18/12/2017 a las 01:31 p. m., Calum McAlinden escribió:
Hi,
Thanks for your interest.
I don't operate anything to do with Emercoin.
Just to clear things up, the Namecoin software handles
registrations using the Namecoin network, and all that I am
currently doing is running a script which turns the Namecoin
blockchain into a zone file used by BIND, which is the .bit zone
for OpenNIC.
There is potential for handling registrations, although I imagine
that would be quite complicated and of limited use. I think the
crucial issue is the spam. I occasionally get emails asking about
domains that aren't resolving as they should be. Normally I've
linked the domains/IP addresses in question to reports of
malicious activity. As much as I'd like to, I can't blacklist
these domains and prevent them from going into the zonefile in the
first place as I would need the agreement of the community to do
this.
I'm more than happy for one of you to operate the zone. Anyone is
free to use the script that I have on my Github, or an alternative
script to produce the zone.
Should there be a vote on who will take control?
Thanks
--
<http://www.bambusoft.com>
Administración / Soporte técnico
admin AT bambusoft.com <mailto:admin AT bambusoft.com> / +52 (33) 1815-6186
Bambusoft http://www.bambusoft.com
Facebook Icon <https://www.facebook.com/bambusoft>
Este mensaje de correo puede contener información privilegiada o
confidencial para uso exclusivo de su(s) respectivo(s) receptor(es).
Cualquier distribución diseminación, copia o la toma de cualquier
acción en relación con la información aqui contenida esta prohibida.
El correo electrónico no es seguro y no puede garantizarse que sea
libre de errores ya que puede ser fácilmente interceptado,
modificado o contener virus. Cualquiera que se comunique con nostros
por correo electrónico se entiende que acepta estos riesgos. La
empresa no se hace responsable de errores u omisiones en este
mensaje y niega cualquier responsabilidad por cualquier daño como
resultado del uso de este correo. Cualquier opinión o afirmación
contenida en este mensaje y sus archivos adjuntos son
responsabilidad única de su autor y no necesariamente representan
los de la empresa.
This e-mail message may contain confidential or legally privileged
information and is intended only for the use of the intended
recipient(s). Any unauthorized disclosure, dissemination,
distribution, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the
information herein is prohibited. E-mails are not secure and cannot
be guaranteed to be error free as they can be intercepted, amended,
or contain viruses. Anyone who communicates with us by e-mail is
deemed to have accepted these risks. Company Name is not responsible
for errors or omissions in this message and denies any
responsibility for any damage arising from the use of e-mail. Any
opinion and other statement contained in this message and any
attachment are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of the company.
Aviso de privacidad
<https://www.bambusoft.com/site/company/privacypolicy.php>
--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
You may unsubscribe by emailing
discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
<mailto:discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org>
--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
- [opennic-discuss] Future of .bit though OpenNIC, Calum McAlinden, 12/18/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Future of .bit though OpenNIC, Administrador, 12/18/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Future of .bit though OpenNIC, vv, 12/18/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Future of .bit though OpenNIC, Administrador, 12/18/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Future of .bit though OpenNIC, Jonah Aragon, 12/18/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Future of .bit though OpenNIC, Calum McAlinden, 12/18/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Future of .bit though OpenNIC, Jonah Aragon, 12/18/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] ***SPAM*** Re: Future of .bit though OpenNIC, Administrador, 12/18/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] ***SPAM*** Re: Future of .bit though OpenNIC, Jonah Aragon, 12/18/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Future of .bit though OpenNIC, Calum McAlinden, 12/18/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Future of .bit though OpenNIC, Administrador, 12/18/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Future of .bit though OpenNIC, Calum McAlinden, 12/19/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Future of .bit though OpenNIC, Calum McAlinden, 12/18/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Future of .bit though OpenNIC, Jonah Aragon, 12/18/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Future of .bit though OpenNIC, Administrador, 12/18/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Future of .bit though OpenNIC, vv, 12/18/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Future of .bit though OpenNIC, Daniel Quintiliani, 12/18/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Future of .bit though OpenNIC, Administrador, 12/18/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Future of .bit though OpenNIC, Administrador, 12/18/2017
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.