Discuss mailing list

["Daniel Quintiliani" <danq AT runbox.com>]

If you wish to do this, this would apply to FUTURE proposals...otherwise 
several past votes
are illegitimate (such as .libre/.free)

--

-Dan Q


On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 01:15:38 +0100, Al Beano <albino AT autistici.org> wrote:

> Recent events suggest that we should clarify a set of voting rules.
> 
> My view is that all proposals submitted to the ML (or DokuWiki as the 
> case may be) should be subject so a simple yes/no vote, and pass with a 
> majority over 50%. A tie would result in the status quo being preserved. 
> No other options would be allowed.
> 
> This system means that all proposals that pass have the full support of 
> the majority of voters. Proposals with more complex implementation 
> details (e.g. the current one re "Reintroduction of past proposals") can 
> be formed however the person writing them wants - including by gathering 
> the thoughts of members using the ML or other means - but they bear no 
> weight until ratified by a simple majority of members.
> 
> albino
> 
> 
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org