Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] Reintroduction of past proposals, IR, R1

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] Reintroduction of past proposals, IR, R1


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Jonah Aragon <jonah AT opennic.org>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] Reintroduction of past proposals, IR, R1
  • Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 23:03:00 -0500
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mail.opennic.org; auth=pass smtp.auth=jonah.aragon AT opennic.org smtp.mailfrom=jonah AT opennic.org
  • Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=opennic.org; s=dkim; t=1532664186; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=hw/JtfMs6mw1d8rFDyCr6vmjDbi8LfRrUjVlLLmD8kg=; b=GwaE9A5EY4OcIvmUru3PtYYvgKlyut4HS3oioJhmWI38tzQNoiHYwAYQx9/QEsmJ+2wrRl MBhAgDhv5IrxsklByIxnaOwrwLVrtsHoxnDLtNUuMzi+/55oWRs7OIwwO1YY26znvNuubd /nxDRXMrr+UjfJIAy20K5P68tCVEqn00naT5GLdpkT2OXxEBzk+V83eWYsp/RlHJQrOrTT ItiLlTQd0WrnVwaSJta1ktYUGwmAd86eIB1mBLRMq6wRDU04hCVZx/WOJIWUAN8UJUw8yl /EcKgtEBeI0po2E087LKHWT2HD33Hdmc0fpq1XSnicfzVDQr83+4i+4VKujQ4g==
  • Arc-seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=opennic.org; t=1532664186; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=VoUkJjhxDQyYQSuk3V96SB8OOOruzwPS7jE0yVjGtP20ZTzkmJss6B1tsA60gV5Fmcp7Th+U9vCysNwH9BTzXhWI8Wx622X8uy9T0gs9fAWhVZsMsJWQ4bQLmykVjC1gj6fkbTAIN5dTZkjqyXKkLzuNXvDXq7m9xgGdL2xJG7bRGNYciYUo9jwjnlPxTlBo4tFwOhXJS7GxMsqfKpSMT7tNjQJ6q0XR1f7z8EvRGbPmEl/EJXGHr0IqQqHOhY4PENUy3QssTWxTqE5jNo5vunZ/glDSM4VeEl8YlmvAvpXYMw8eoZRJwFk2roe6Jjbk24dYX4VX0eTK0a3518NWPg==

That’s perfectly valid, and that is the exact outcome of just voting “F, G,
H, E, D, I”, which is why I only voted “H, I, G”. In my case, if those three
are eliminated I’ve essentially abstained from all further rounds.

The outcome of this vote will undoubtedly be tallied by multiple people
(including myself) because this is such a relatively complex method of voting
anyways, so we’ll make sure everything is good and valid.

Jonah

> On Jul 26, 2018, at 9:45 PM, Jacob Bachmeyer <jcb62281 AT gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Then I will clarify: F, G, H, E, D, I and I abstain if all of those are
> eliminated.
>
> -- Jacob
>
> Daniel Quintiliani wrote:
>> A reminder: "Vote up to 9 times in order of preference. In each round, an
>> option may be chosen only once, and only the options given below are
>> valid." So "I" only counts once, with your vote: "F, G, H, E, D, I"
>> --
>>
>> -Dan Q
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 20:41:06 -0500, Jacob Bachmeyer <jcb62281 AT gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Daniel Quintiliani wrote:
>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>> Previously failed proposals to create OpenNIC TLDs, and all identical
>>>> duplicates of proposals which have failed to pass, shall not be
>>>> introduced for another:
>>>>
>>>> (A) 12 months
>>>> (B) 9 months
>>>> (C) 8 months
>>>> (D) 6 months
>>>> (E) 4 months
>>>> (F) 3 months
>>>> (G) 1 month
>>>> (H) 1 week
>>>> (I) I vote against this change in policy.
>>>>
>>> I vote: F, G, H, E, D, I, I, I, I.
>>>
>>> -- Jacob
>>>
>>>
>>> --------
>>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You may unsubscribe by
>>> emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> --------
>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You may unsubscribe by
>> emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>>
>
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page