discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
- From: kevin <krattai AT gmail.com>
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] FRX update 18122600
- Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2018 12:24:26 -0600
Now that I think about it, I think it will be a good idea to
interconnect with dn42 (.dn42) and also tor (.onion) as "on purpose"
bridges for the user.
Will have to figure out the logic. Probably have supernodes (not
necessarily the www supernodes and perhaps preferably not) on the FRX
network that will interconnect and bridge (probably transparent,
although maybe not) those subnets. Probably by way of some select on
the edge router of the user (whether their VM or their SoC device.
Could set up a nanomsg app for the person to turn these "services" on
or off on their edge.
On Wed, 2018-12-26 at 03:01 -0600, kevin wrote:
> Just thought I'd mention this here as this group will mostly
> this than many of the other crowds I chat with, and to just say I'm
> pretty pleased about this.
> I now have 2 VPNs running on the network. I postponed tinc and n2n
> now as I battled with freeLAN to see if it works. Unfortunately
> there's not very much documentation on it so took a bit of fighting.
> So, running OpenVPN on one subnet and freelan running on another
> subnet. All trafic routing as expected.
> End result is (hopefully) the redundancy of the network. And DNS can
> be routed across all subnets, of course. Plus, do need to make sure
> that the network is vpn agnostic for those who are doing initial
> Do need to get quagga/BGP working next, probably. Although I may now
> work on getting tinc or n2n running across the existing vpn(s) to see
> if a separate segment can be hup'd over the existing vpns for full
> (layer2; not sure how well this might work, but hopeful) and allow
> the failure (or removal) of the underlying vpns to test segment
> resilience as well as network segment autonomy being an overlying,
> functional FRX seg. oh, and also dual stack needs to be configured
> with possible allowance for IPv6 native segments with 6in4 / 6to4 as
> Will need supernodes (public facing servers and IPs) to ensure
> accessibility and failover / loadbalancing.
> Also need to script for supernode setup and also probably create kvm
> images for same and related functionalities. I do have images for
> raspberry pi's that will eventually be working as edge devices for
> users at their location of use as well as roaming node function. I
> have some stuff on gitlab as well as sourceforge, but migrating to
> gitlab (do have a local gitlab setup as well) to ensure resilience of
> project and because github / microsoft... I do run an openstack
> instance as I was hoping to use it for SDN and some other features
> it's on a pretty low budget (old) server so can't really utilize it
> production. and then there's nextcloud and some other p2p apps to
> set up. I did manage to grab freelan, tinc, and n2n source in order
> see if it can be tweaked. I'm also currently using MQTT for
> across the network although I do want to migrate to nanomsg / nng for
> future message passing for various functions and features.
> I am providing some light updates on the public forum:
> I do want to set up a SIG on that baord though, to keep tech talks
> separated from other potential conversations. Do want to set up a
> (maybe IRC) or similar server as well for chat functionality.
- [opennic-discuss] FRX update 18122600, kevin, 12/26/2018
- Re: [opennic-discuss] FRX update 18122600, kevin, 12/26/2018
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.