discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: Jeff Taylor <shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net>
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Seized poker domains
- Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 09:34:13 -0600
- List-archive: <http://lists.darkdna.net/pipermail/discuss>
- List-id: <discuss.lists.opennicproject.org>
On 04/22/2011 04:14 AM, Psilo wrote:
I prefer option 2, but I am not sure to create a custom build of bind9 would be a good idea.We need to preserve a simple method for folks to still reach the pages that ICANN is directing too. I suppose we could create records under the .icann zone, essentially merging part of method #1 in order to handle this, in which case everything would be contained within DNS entries. I might even be able to fully automate this method, so the simplicity would still be retained.
Does everyone feel comfortable with this solution applied to method #2?
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Seized poker domains, (continued)
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Seized poker domains, Zach Gibbens, 04/18/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Seized poker domains, Psilo, 04/18/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Seized poker domains, Amrit Panesar, 04/18/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Seized poker domains, Alex Nordlund, 04/18/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Seized poker domains, Maximi89, 04/18/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Seized poker domains, Amrit Panesar, 04/18/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Seized poker domains, Zach Gibbens, 04/19/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Seized poker domains, Alex Nordlund, 04/18/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Seized poker domains, Zach Gibbens, 04/18/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Seized poker domains, teamcoltra AT gmail.com, 04/21/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Seized poker domains, Psilo, 04/22/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Seized poker domains, Jeff Taylor, 04/22/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Seized poker domains, Amrit Panesar, 04/22/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Seized poker domains, Jeff Taylor, 04/22/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.