Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] Seized poker domains

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] Seized poker domains


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Zach Gibbens <infocop411 AT gmail.com>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Seized poker domains
  • Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 11:12:29 -0400
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type; b=t99O0cff3+1kmx5Y0oNP9wyAQ7yZzq4C4YpAL1h+uihEFZX7aW22xGK3gj+H0/QKy4 sBT6Q0YPEHzJFiNNu9v/nU6rurla9FSiUhZTAk3aWUYdIrfq79LQwroWGm41MfC3IfLi 4sqIvUTArSFcunsZNIjGIAVkP9PIN7udQ4HZg=
  • List-archive: <http://lists.darkdna.net/pipermail/discuss>
  • List-id: <discuss.lists.opennicproject.org>

That statement goes with the presumption this project lacks meaning now,
However I agree it would give Additional Meaning. Lets put it to a vote

Signed,
Zach Gibbens
I for one love my alphabet soup-based overloards

On 04/16/2011 05:28 PM, Psilo wrote:
> I believe this would give a meaning to the project.
>
>
> 2011/4/16 Jeff Taylor <shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net>
>
>> It's most likely that the changes simply have not propagated to you yet.
>> It does take time for DNS entries to spread world-wide.
>>
>> As far as protecting seized domains - That was a concept I brought up, but
>> there didn't seem to be enough interest to pursue it. Of course I can
>> still
>> add that feature at any time, but we would need to have a vote by OpenNic
>> members to authorize the service.
>>
>>
>> On 04/16/2011 05:15 AM, Psilo wrote:
>>
>> Or maybe it's not even 42 registry. I am a bit confused, since I don't know
>> how to find where this comes from.
>>
>>
>> 2011/4/16 Psilo <dns AT psilo.org>
>>
>>> Ok the "protection" was not from OpenNIC but from 42 registry. My DNS
>>> serves both.
>>> Sorry.
>>>
>>> 2011/4/16 Zach Gibbens <infocop411 AT gmail.com>
>>>
>>>> On 04/16/2011 04:33 AM, Psilo wrote:
>>>>> I can see that OpenNIC has successfully protected these new "seized"
>>>> poker
>>>>> domains, congratulations :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Can we have more info about the process of protecting domains? Is this
>>>>> manual or automatic?
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there a list of protected domain names?
>>>>>
>>>>> Shouldn't we advertise about this action on OpenNIC website main page?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> discuss mailing list
>>>>> discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
>>>>> http://lists.darkdna.net/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>> I'm not seeing them protected on my box, instead pointing at nameservers
>>>> of the FBI’s Cyber Initiative and Resource Fusion Unit
>>>>
>>>> Last I heard it's a manual process, and not yet in the works (but I'm
>>>> about a couple of weeks behind on things here, trying to catch up,
>>>> hopefully I'm wrong on that)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> discuss mailing list
>>>> discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
>>>> http://lists.darkdna.net/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> discuss mailing
>> listdiscuss AT lists.opennicproject.orghttp://lists.darkdna.net/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> discuss mailing list
>> discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
>> http://lists.darkdna.net/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
> http://lists.darkdna.net/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page