Discuss mailing list

[sjeap <sjeap AT lavabit.com>]

Yes, the link is fine indeed, no problem there.

I just haven't read that history, have I? :) That is insane, incredible!
"lovely" describes it far too nice... Luckily one haven't peered
anything with them.

Regards sjeap

Am 15.05.2012 22:10, schrieb Brian Koontz:
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 09:48:51AM -0700, Sam Dodrill wrote:
>> Tis a shame that the proof given is a dead link.
> Really?  Link worked fine for me.  Maybe a client-side issue?
> 
>   --Brian
> 
> -- OpenNIC (the sequel) co-founder and wikimaster IRC: Freenode.net channel 
> #opennic 

Am 15.05.2012 18:48, schrieb Sam Dodrill:
> Tis a shame that the proof given is a dead link.
> 
> Quick Googling has gotten me this:
> 
> http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2012/03/02/cesidian-root-bizarre-peek-at-world-wide-weird/
> 
> Just thought other people would want to read it too.
> 
> Sam Dodrill

Am 15.05.2012 15:17, schrieb Alex Hanselka:
> http://osdir.com/ml/network.opennic.general/2006-01/msg00072.html
> 
> That will give you some more info on why that will probably never happen.
> 
> 
> ---
> Alex Hanselka
> alex AT opennicproject.org

Am 15.05.2012 09:31, schrieb Amrit Panesar:
> As far as I know, there is no peering agreement between us. There's.. 
> history between OpenNIC and cesidian. Someone should link to that lovely 
> email exchange somewhere in the archives.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> -Neo
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On May 15, 2012, at 12:21 AM, Wolfgang Samsinger <saw AT samsinger.at> wrote:
> 
>> Hi
>>
>> Some websites state, that there is a peering agreement between cesidian 
>> root 
>> and opennic (planned?).
>> I didn't find any informations here. It seems that most opennic domains 
>> are 
>> resolved on the cesidian nameserver, but not all.
>> free returns their own server and null and pirate don't work.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Wolfgang