discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: Alex Nordlund <deep.alexander AT gmail.com>
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Just a Question
- Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 18:47:11 +0200
http://web.archive.org/web/20060516203303/http://cyberterra.com/root/birth-of-cr.html
--Alex N
On May 16, 2012 6:35 PM, "Sam Dodrill" <shadow.h511 AT gmail.com> wrote:
By the link, I mean the ink in the message. Or this link:
http://cyberterra.com/root/birth-of-cr.html
Sam Dodrill
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 7:11 AM, sjeap <sjeap AT lavabit.com> wrote:
> Yes, the link is fine indeed, no problem there.
>
> I just haven't read that history, have I? :) That is insane, incredible!
> "lovely" describes it far too nice... Luckily one haven't peered
> anything with them.
>
> Regards sjeap
>
> Am 15.05.2012 22:10, schrieb Brian Koontz:
>> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 09:48:51AM -0700, Sam Dodrill wrote:
>>> Tis a shame that the proof given is a dead link.
>> Really? Link worked fine for me. Maybe a client-side issue?
>>
>> --Brian
>>
>> -- OpenNIC (the sequel) co-founder and wikimaster IRC: Freenode.net channel #opennic
>
> Am 15.05.2012 18:48, schrieb Sam Dodrill:
>> Tis a shame that the proof given is a dead link.
>>
>> Quick Googling has gotten me this:
>>
>> http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2012/03/02/cesidian-root-bizarre-peek-at-world-wide-weird/
>>
>> Just thought other people would want to read it too.
>>
>> Sam Dodrill
>
> Am 15.05.2012 15:17, schrieb Alex Hanselka:
>> http://osdir.com/ml/network.opennic.general/2006-01/msg00072.html
>>
>> That will give you some more info on why that will probably never happen.
>>
>>
>> ---
>> Alex Hanselka
>> alex AT opennicproject.org
>
> Am 15.05.2012 09:31, schrieb Amrit Panesar:
>> As far as I know, there is no peering agreement between us. There's.. history between OpenNIC and cesidian. Someone should link to that lovely email exchange somewhere in the archives.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> -Neo
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On May 15, 2012, at 12:21 AM, Wolfgang Samsinger <saw AT samsinger.at> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Some websites state, that there is a peering agreement between cesidian root
>>> and opennic (planned?).
>>> I didn't find any informations here. It seems that most opennic domains are
>>> resolved on the cesidian nameserver, but not all.
>>> free returns their own server and null and pirate don't work.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Wolfgang
>
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
- [opennic-discuss] Just a Question, Wolfgang Samsinger, 05/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Just a Question, Amrit Panesar, 05/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Just a Question, sjeap, 05/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Just a Question, Sam Dodrill, 05/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Just a Question, Alex Nordlund, 05/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Just a Question, Falk Husemann, 05/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Just a Question, Amrit Panesar, 05/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Just a Question, Falk Husemann, 05/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Just a Question, Alex Nordlund, 05/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Just a Question, Sam Dodrill, 05/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Just a Question, sjeap, 05/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Just a Question, Alex Hanselka, 05/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Just a Question, Sam Dodrill, 05/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Just a Question, Brian Koontz, 05/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Just a Question, Wolfgang Samsinger, 05/16/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Just a Question, Brian Koontz, 05/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Just a Question, Sam Dodrill, 05/15/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Just a Question, Amrit Panesar, 05/15/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.