Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] Just a Question

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] Just a Question


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Sam Dodrill <shadow.h511 AT gmail.com>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Just a Question
  • Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 09:35:28 -0700

By the link, I mean the ink in the message. Or this link:
http://cyberterra.com/root/birth-of-cr.html

Sam Dodrill


On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 7:11 AM, sjeap <sjeap AT lavabit.com> wrote:
> Yes, the link is fine indeed, no problem there.
>
> I just haven't read that history, have I? :) That is insane, incredible!
> "lovely" describes it far too nice... Luckily one haven't peered
> anything with them.
>
> Regards sjeap
>
> Am 15.05.2012 22:10, schrieb Brian Koontz:
>> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 09:48:51AM -0700, Sam Dodrill wrote:
>>> Tis a shame that the proof given is a dead link.
>> Really?  Link worked fine for me.  Maybe a client-side issue?
>>
>>   --Brian
>>
>> -- OpenNIC (the sequel) co-founder and wikimaster IRC: Freenode.net
>> channel #opennic
>
> Am 15.05.2012 18:48, schrieb Sam Dodrill:
>> Tis a shame that the proof given is a dead link.
>>
>> Quick Googling has gotten me this:
>>
>> http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2012/03/02/cesidian-root-bizarre-peek-at-world-wide-weird/
>>
>> Just thought other people would want to read it too.
>>
>> Sam Dodrill
>
> Am 15.05.2012 15:17, schrieb Alex Hanselka:
>> http://osdir.com/ml/network.opennic.general/2006-01/msg00072.html
>>
>> That will give you some more info on why that will probably never happen.
>>
>>
>> ---
>> Alex Hanselka
>> alex AT opennicproject.org
>
> Am 15.05.2012 09:31, schrieb Amrit Panesar:
>> As far as I know, there is no peering agreement between us. There's..
>> history between OpenNIC and cesidian. Someone should link to that lovely
>> email exchange somewhere in the archives.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> -Neo
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On May 15, 2012, at 12:21 AM, Wolfgang Samsinger <saw AT samsinger.at> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Some websites state, that there is a peering agreement between cesidian
>>> root
>>> and opennic (planned?).
>>> I didn't find any informations here. It seems that most opennic domains
>>> are
>>> resolved on the cesidian nameserver, but not all.
>>> free returns their own server and null and pirate don't work.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Wolfgang
>
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page