Discuss mailing list

[Filip Lamparski <matka.poohatka AT gmail.com>]

While Namecoins are a legit idea, dot bit will be redundant, seeing that OpenNIC has domains for free, while dot bit is cryptopaid.

But hey, if this brings users, then why not? My vote is a cautious for.

On Jul 12, 2012 8:10 AM, "Julian DeMarchi" <julian AT jdcomputers.com.au> wrote:

On 05/17/2012 08:18 AM, Khalahan wrote:
> Hi everybody !
>
> Here is a first draft for a peering agreement between dotBIT and OpenNIC.
> Depending on who run's the authoritative server for .bit (me or someone
> from opennic), it may need to be adjusted.
>
> See http://dot-bit.org/PeeringAgreement:OpenNIC for future revisions.
>
> Current draft :
>> *Peering agreement between OpenNIC and DotBIT*
>>
>> The dotBIT project (http://dot-bit.org) currently manage one gTLD : .bit
>>
>> Reference server that should be used by OpenNIC (managed by
>> khal{at}dot-bit.org, the owner of http://dot-bit.org) is located in
>> France with ip address 178.32.31.41
>>
>> Here is the list of all dns servers :
>> http://dot-bit.org/How_To_Browse_Bit_Domains
>>
>>
>> More informations about the presentation of dotBIT on the OpenNIC
>> mailing list :
>>
>> http://lists.opennicproject.org/arc/discuss/2012-03/msg00137.html
>>
>>
>> *Engagements :*
>>
>>
>> - DotBIT reference DNS server will act as a t2 server and reply to
>> OpenNIC zones.
>>
>> - DotBIT will encourage other DNS servers to act as t2 servers.
>>
>> - OpenNIC DNS servers will resolve dotBIT zone(s) : only .bit for now.
>
> Any comments ?
>

Guys - I'd like to motion a vote for the .bit peering agreement as laid
out above.

--julian



--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org