discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] DRAFT : Peering agreement between OpenNIC and DotBIT

From: Alex Hanselka <alex AT opennicproject.org>
To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] DRAFT : Peering agreement between OpenNIC and DotBIT
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 09:59:44 -0500

On Jul 12, 2012, at 9:56 AM, Filip Lamparski wrote:

While Namecoins are a legit idea, dot bit will be redundant, seeing that OpenNIC has domains for free, while dot bit is cryptopaid.
But hey, if this brings users, then why not? My vote is a cautious for.

Opennic has no real rules against "for pay" TLDs, its just that traditionally we have never had any. :)

Re: [opennic-discuss] DRAFT : Peering agreement between OpenNIC and DotBIT, Julian DeMarchi, 07/12/2012
- Re: Re: [opennic-discuss] DRAFT : Peering agreement between OpenNIC and DotBIT, woodq11, 07/12/2012
  - Re: Re: Re: [opennic-discuss] DRAFT : Peering agreement between OpenNIC and DotBIT, woodq11, 07/12/2012
    - Re: Re: Re: [opennic-discuss] DRAFT : Peering agreement between OpenNIC and DotBIT, Alex Nordlund, 07/12/2012
      - Re: [opennic-discuss] DRAFT : Peering agreement between OpenNIC and DotBIT, Amrit Panesar, 07/12/2012
        
        Re: [opennic-discuss] DRAFT : Peering agreement between OpenNIC and DotBIT, Alex Hanselka, 07/12/2012
        
        Re: Re: [opennic-discuss] DRAFT : Peering agreement between OpenNIC and DotBIT, woodq11, 07/12/2012
      - Re: [opennic-discuss] DRAFT : Peering agreement between OpenNIC and DotBIT, Alex Hanselka, 07/12/2012
- Re: [opennic-discuss] DRAFT : Peering agreement between OpenNIC and DotBIT, Filip Lamparski, 07/12/2012
  - Re: [opennic-discuss] DRAFT : Peering agreement between OpenNIC and DotBIT, Alex Hanselka, 07/12/2012
    - Re: [opennic-discuss] DRAFT : Peering agreement between OpenNIC and DotBIT, Sam Dodrill, 07/12/2012